Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;142(6):476-485.
doi: 10.1111/acps.13233. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

Early identification of bipolar disorder among young adults - a 22-year community birth cohort

F D Rabelo-da-Ponte  1   2   3 , J G Feiten  1   2   3 , B Mwangi  4 , F C Barros  5 , F C Wehrmeister  5 , A M Menezes  5 , F Kapczinski  3   6 , I C Passos  1   2   3 , M Kunz  1   2   3
Affiliations

Early identification of bipolar disorder among young adults - a 22-year community birth cohort

F D Rabelo-da-Ponte et al. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: We set forth to build a prediction model of individuals who would develop bipolar disorder (BD) using machine learning techniques in a large birth cohort.

Methods: A total of 3748 subjects were studied at birth, 11, 15, 18, and 22 years of age in a community birth cohort. We used the elastic net algorithm with 10-fold cross-validation to predict which individuals would develop BD at endpoint (22 years) at each follow-up visit before diagnosis (from birth up to 18 years). Afterward, we used the best model to calculate the subgroups of subjects at higher and lower risk of developing BD and analyzed the clinical differences among them.

Results: A total of 107 (2.8%) individuals within the cohort presented with BD type I, 26 (0.6%) with BD type II, and 87 (2.3%) with BD not otherwise specified. Frequency of female individuals was 58.82% (n = 150) in the BD sample and 53.02% (n = 1868) among the unaffected population. The model with variables assessed at the 18-year follow-up visit achieved the best performance: AUC 0.82 (CI 0.75-0.88), balanced accuracy 0.75, sensitivity 0.72, and specificity 0.77. The most important variables to detect BD at the 18-year follow-up visit were suicide risk, generalized anxiety disorder, parental physical abuse, and financial problems. Additionally, the high-risk subgroup of BD showed a high frequency of drug use and depressive symptoms.

Conclusions: We developed a risk calculator for BD incorporating both demographic and clinical variables from a 22-year birth cohort. Our findings support previous studies in high-risk samples showing the significance of suicide risk and generalized anxiety disorder prior to the onset of BD, and highlight the role of social factors and adverse life events.

Keywords: bipolar disorder; clinical aspects; epidemiology; population surveys.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Colombo C, Fossati A, Colom F. Bipolar disorder. Depress Res Treat2020;2012:525837.
    1. Dagani J, Signorini G, Nielssen O et al. Meta-analysis of the interval between the onset and management of bipolar disorder. Can J Psychiatry / La Rev Can Psychiatr 2017;62:247-258.
    1. Goldberg JF, Harrow M, Whiteside JE. Risk for bipolar illness in patients initially hospitalized for unipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:1265-1270.
    1. Maina G, Bechon E, Rigardetto S, Salvi V. General medical conditions are associated with delay to treatment in patients with bipolar disorder. Psychosomatics 2013;54:437-442.
    1. Goi PD, Vianna-Sulzbach M, Silveira L et al. Treatment delay is associated with more episodes and more severe illness staging progression in patients with bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res 2015;227:372-373.

Publication types

MeSH terms