Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Sep 16;15(1):78.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01039-2.

Examining fidelity in the INFORM trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention

Liane R Ginsburg  1 , Matthias Hoben  2 , Adam Easterbrook  2 , Elizabeth Andersen  3 , Ruth A Anderson  4 , Lisa Cranley  5 , Holly J Lanham  6 , Peter G Norton  7 , Lori E Weeks  8 , Carole A Estabrooks  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Examining fidelity in the INFORM trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention

Liane R Ginsburg et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Fidelity in complex behavioral interventions is underexplored. This study examines the fidelity of the INFORM trial and explores the relationship between fidelity, study arm, and the trial's primary outcome-care aide involvement in formal team communications about resident care.

Methods: A concurrent process evaluation of implementation fidelity was conducted in 33 nursing homes in Western Canada (Alberta and British Columbia). Study participants were from 106 clinical care units clustered in 33 nursing homes randomized to the Basic and Enhanced-Assisted Feedback arms of the INFORM trial.

Results: Fidelity of the INFORM intervention was moderate to high, with fidelity delivery and receipt higher than fidelity enactment for both study arms. Higher enactment teams experienced a significantly larger improvement in formal team communications between baseline and follow-up than lower enactment teams (F(1, 70) = 4.27, p = .042).

Conclusions: Overall fidelity enactment was associated with improvements in formal team communications, but the study arm was not. This suggests that the intensity with which an intervention is offered and delivered may be less important than the intensity with which intervention participants enact the core components of an intervention. Greater attention to fidelity assessment and publication of fidelity results through studies such as this one is critical to improving the utility of published trials.

Keywords: Nursing homes; Process evaluation; Trial fidelity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Interaction between time and study arm
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hwang TJ, Carpenter D, Lauffenburger JC, Wang B, Franklin JM, Kesselheim AS. Failure of investigational drugs in late-stage clinical development and publication of trial results. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:1826–1833. - PubMed
    1. Schooler JW. Metascience could rescue the “replication crisis”. Nature. 2014;515:9. - PubMed
    1. Eccles MP. Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. The Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG) Implement Sci. 2006;1:4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fixsen DL. Blase K a., Naoom SF, Wallace F. Core implementation components. Res Soc Work Pract. 2009;19:531–540.
    1. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J. 2015;350:h1258. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding