Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 13;46(4):501-513.
doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1765756.

Defining and understanding dyslexia: past, present and future

Affiliations

Defining and understanding dyslexia: past, present and future

Margaret J Snowling et al. Oxf Rev Educ. .

Abstract

Dyslexia is a difficulty in learning to decode (read aloud) and to spell. DSM5 classifies dyslexia as one form of neurodevelopmental disorder. Neurodevelopmental disorders are heritable, life-long conditions with early onset. For many years, research on dyslexia proceeded on the basis that it was a specific learning difficulty - specific meaning that the difficulty could not be explained in terms of obvious causes such as sensory problems or general learning difficulties (low IQ). However, the failure to find qualitative differences in reading, and phonological skills, between children with dyslexia and children with more general learning problems led this kind of 'discrepancy' definition to fall from favour. The Rose Review stated that dyslexia can occur across the IQ range and that poor decoding skills require the same kinds of intervention irrespective of IQ. In this paper, we argue that loosening the criteria for dyslexia has influenced common understanding of the condition and led to diagnostic confusion. In the longer term, the use of the term may need to change. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Keywords: Dyslexia; definition; history; reading difficulties; reading disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adlof, S. M., & Hogan, T. P. (2019). If we don’t look, we won’t see: Measuring language development to inform literacy instruction. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(2), 210–217. 10.1177/2372732219839075 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al Otaiba, S., Wagner, R. K., & Miller, B. (2014). “Waiting to fail” redux: Understanding inadequate response to intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(3), 129–133. 10.1177/0731948714525622 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association . (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
    1. Angold, A., Costello, E. J., & Erkanli, A. (1999). Comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(1), 57–87. 10.1111/1469-7610.00424 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bannatyne, A. (1974). Diagnosis: a note on recategorization of the wisc scaled scores. Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 7, 272-274. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources