Intra-articular arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with interference screw: clinical and isokinetic evaluation
- PMID: 32939498
- PMCID: PMC7479042
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.012
Intra-articular arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with interference screw: clinical and isokinetic evaluation
Abstract
Background: Although biceps tenodesis has been widely used to treat its pathologies, few studies looked at the objective evaluation of elbow strength after this procedure. The purpose of this study is to clinically evaluate patients submitted to long head of the biceps (LHB) tenodesis with interference screws through an intra-articular approach and analyze the results of an isokinetic test to measure elbow flexion and forearm supination strengths.
Methods: Patients who had biceps tenodesis were included in the study if they had a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Patients were excluded if they had concomitant irreparable cuff tears or previous or current contralateral shoulder pain or weakness. Postoperative evaluation was based on University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score and on measurements of elbow flexion and supination strength, using an isokinetic dynamometer. Tests were conducted in both arms, with velocity set at 60º/s with 5 concentric-concentric repetitions.
Results: Thirty-three patients were included and the most common concomitant diagnosis were rotator cuff tear (69%) and superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions (28%). The average UCLA score improved from 15.1 preoperatively to 31.9 in the final follow-up (P < .001). Isokinetic tests showed no difference in peak torque between the upper limbs. One patient had residual pain in the biceps groove. None of the patients had Popeye deformity. UCLA score and follow-up length did not demonstrate correlation with peak torque.
Conclusion: Arthroscopic proximal biceps tenodesis with interference screw, close to the articular margin, yielded good clinical results. Isokinetic tests revealed no difference to the contralateral side in peak torque for both supination and elbow flexion.
Keywords: Shoulder; arthroscopy; biceps tendon; elbow strength; isokinetic evaluation; tenodesis.
© 2020 The Authors.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Comparison of Treatments for Superior Labrum-Biceps Complex Lesions With Concomitant Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Analysis of Debridement, Biceps Tenotomy, and Biceps Tenodesis.Arthroscopy. 2016 Jun;32(6):958-67. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.036. Epub 2016 Feb 23. Arthroscopy. 2016. PMID: 26921128 Clinical Trial.
-
Modified arthroscopic intra-articular transtendinous looped biceps tenodesis leads to satisfactory functional outcomes and less frequent Popeye deformity compared to biceps tenotomy.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 16;18(1):603. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04078-9. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 37587498 Free PMC article.
-
Improvement in long head of biceps function and lower rate of biceps deformities after subpectoral tenodesis with cortical button and interference screw vs. arthroscopic tenotomy: a 4-year follow-up.JSES Int. 2022 Jun 20;6(5):820-827. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.010. eCollection 2022 Sep. JSES Int. 2022. PMID: 36081695 Free PMC article.
-
Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized controlled trials.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 May;30(5):951-960. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Dec 26. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021. PMID: 33373685
-
A meta-analysis comparing tenotomy or tenodesis for lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon with concomitant reparable rotator cuff tears.J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Nov 15;14(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1429-x. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31729995 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using press-fit bony plug: a case series study.Int Orthop. 2024 Mar;48(3):785-792. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-06021-3. Epub 2023 Nov 4. Int Orthop. 2024. PMID: 37924503 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Amstutz H.C., Sew Hoy A.L., Clarke I.C. UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;155:7–20. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources