Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 6;4(3):644-648.
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.04.006. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes after noncorrective, concentric reaming of B2 glenoids

Affiliations

Total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes after noncorrective, concentric reaming of B2 glenoids

W Jeffrey Grantham et al. JSES Int. .

Abstract

Background: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an effective procedure for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) delivering reliable pain relief and improved shoulder function. Abnormal glenoid morphologies are common, and biconcave glenoids are enigmas that have been associated with poor clinical outcomes and implant survivorship.

Purpose: To assess the clinical outcome scores of patients who underwent noncorrective, concentric reaming for TSA with biconcave glenoids (B2). We hypothesized that patients with B2 glenoids who underwent TSA with glenoid implantation using noncorrective, concentric reaming would have significant improvements in clinical outcome scores and high implant survivorship.

Methods: All patients who underwent anatomic TSA for GHOA with B2 glenoids, performed by a single surgeon, between July 2006 and December 2015 with minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed. Walch classification was obtained from preoperative imaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography). Clinical outcome scores were prospectively collected and included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey physical component summary (PCS), and patient satisfaction. Clinical failures (revision TSA surgery or conversion to reverse TSA) and complications were reported. Paired t test and bivariate correlations level of significance was set at P = .05. Survivorship analysis with implant failure as an endpoint was done using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

Results: 51 TSA in 49 patients (9 females, 40 males) with primary GHOA with B2 glenoids were performed with a mean age of 64 (range 36-81 years) at the time of surgery. The mean retroversion was 19.1° (range 5.4°-38°), and posterior decentering was 42.0% (range 19.4%-78.5%). At final evaluation, 45/51 anatomic TSAs (88% follow-up) with a mean follow-up of 4.9 years (range 2.0-10.4 years) were assessed. All clinical outcome scores improved significantly pre- to postoperatively: ASES, 52.5 to 79.6 (P < .001); SANE, 52.4 to 74.7 (P < .001); QuickDASH, 39.2 to 19.1 (P = .001); and PCS, 40.9 to 48.9 (P = .001). Median postoperative satisfaction was 9 (range 1-10). There were 2 failures and 4 that required another surgery -subscapularis repair, lysis of adhesions, irrigation and débridement, and one to explore the status of the subscapularis for persistent pain. The implant survivorship rate was 95% at a mean follow-up of 4.9 years.

Conclusion: Anatomic total shoulder replacement with minimally noncorrective, concentric reaming in patients with B2 glenoids had significant improvement in clinical outcome scores, high patient satisfaction, and high survivorship in this cohort.

Keywords: Total shoulder arthroplasty; biconcave glenoids (B2) glenoids; outcomes; survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Axial magnetic resonance image of a preoperative B2 glenoid. The retroversion (r) was measured from a line perpendicular to the plane of the scapula (Friedman line)., Posterior decentering compared the diameter of the humeral head to a line along the scapula axis to give a percentage of decentering (s/d × 100%).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Coronal magnetic resonance image of a preoperative B2 glenoid. Glenoid inclination (β) was measured as the angle between a line perpendicular to the sclerotic line of the supraspinatus fossa and the glenoid fossa line.,
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Preoperative magnetic resonance image and (B) postoperative radiographs demonstrating the minimal noncorrective reaming technique. The anteroposterior view shows persistent glenoid inclination (β) and the axillary view demonstrates remaining retroversion (r).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier implant survivorship curve.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chin P.C., Hachadorian M.E., Pulido P.A., Munro M.L., Meric G., Hoenecke H.R., Jr. Outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis in type B glenoids. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24:1888–1893. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.052. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clavert P., Millett P.J., Warner J.J. Glenoid resurfacing: what are the limits to asymmetric reaming for posterior erosion? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:843–848. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daggett M., Werner B., Gauci M.O., Chaoui J., Walch G. Comparison of glenoid inclination angle using different clinical imaging modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25:180–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Denard P.J., Walch G. Current concepts in the surgical management of primary glenohumeral arthritis with a biconcave glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:1589–1598. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.06.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedman R.J., Hawthorne K.B., Genez B.M. The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1032–1037. - PubMed