Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;24(11):2456-2465.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04791-4. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Upper Gastrointestinal Neoplasia-a North American Perspective

Affiliations

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Upper Gastrointestinal Neoplasia-a North American Perspective

Alex Chen et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: Organ-sparing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an acceptable treatment strategy for superficial neoplastic lesions of the esophagus and stomach. The adoption of this technique has lagged in North America compared with Asia, and we sought to report on our experiences with ESD for upper GI neoplasia.

Methods: A prospectively entered database of all patients undergoing endoscopic resection of esophageal and gastric neoplasia at McGill University from 2009 to 2019 was queried for those who received ESD.

Results: A total of 103 consecutive ESDs were identified from 2009 to 2019. Seventy-one (69%) patients were male and the median age was 72 (range: 38-90). Sixty-one (59%) cases were esophageal and 42 (41%) gastric. Forty-nine (48%) were performed in the endoscopy suite under local sedation only. Perforation occurred in 9 patients (7 esophageal and 2 stomach), of which 3 required operative repair. Histology was principally invasive carcinoma (79, 77%), with 17 (16%) dysplastic lesions (e.g., HGD), 1 (1%) neuroendocrine tumor, and 7 (7%) benign lesions. En bloc resection was achieved in 90 (87%), and the complete resection rate was 74 (72%), with 51 (50%) of procedures fulfilling the criteria for curative resection. At medium of 23-month (2-199) follow-up of these 51 curative resections, one case of recurrent carcinoma was found at follow-up and was managed with repeat endoscopic resection. Non-curative ESDs were found 45 (R1 resection = 29: risk of lymph node metastasis = 16), 21 had active surveillance, and 24 were resected.

Conclusion: ESD is a viable, effective, and safe therapeutic and staging modality for superficial lesions of the stomach and esophagus.

Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Esophageal neoplasm; Gastric neoplasm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends - An update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(1):16-27. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bennett C, Wang Y, Pan T. Endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. October 2009.
    1. D’Journo XB, Thomas PA. Current management of esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(Suppl 2):S253. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Hiki Y. [Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early gastric cancer]. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1996;97(4):273-278. - PubMed
    1. Pech O, May A, Manner H, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for patients with mucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(3):652-660.e1. - DOI - PubMed