Induction of labor with Foley catheter and risk of subsequent preterm birth: follow-up study of two randomized controlled trials (PROBAAT-1 and -2)
- PMID: 32939850
- PMCID: PMC7898639
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.23117
Induction of labor with Foley catheter and risk of subsequent preterm birth: follow-up study of two randomized controlled trials (PROBAAT-1 and -2)
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the rate of preterm birth (PTB) in a subsequent pregnancy in women who had undergone term induction using a Foley catheter compared with prostaglandins.
Methods: This was a follow-up study of two large randomized controlled trials (PROBAAT-1 and PROBAAT-2). In the original trials, women with a term singleton pregnancy with the fetus in cephalic presentation and with an indication for labor induction were randomized to receive either a 30-mL Foley catheter or prostaglandins (vaginal prostaglandin E2 in PROBAAT-1 and oral misoprostol in PROBAAT-2). Data on subsequent ongoing pregnancies > 16 weeks' gestation were collected from hospital charts from clinics participating in this follow-up study. The main outcome measure was preterm birth < 37 weeks' gestation in a subsequent pregnancy.
Results: Fourteen hospitals agreed to participate in this follow-up study. Of the 1142 eligible women, 572 had been allocated to induction of labor using a Foley catheter and 570 to induction of labor using prostaglandins. Of these, 162 (14%) were lost to follow-up. In total, 251 and 258 women had a known subsequent pregnancy > 16 weeks' gestation in the Foley catheter and prostaglandin groups, respectively. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. The overall rate of PTB in a subsequent pregnancy was 9/251 (3.6%) in the Foley catheter group vs 10/258 (3.9%) in the prostaglandin group (relative risk (RR), 0.93; 95% CI, 0.38-2.24), and the rate of spontaneous PTB was 5/251 (2.0%) vs 5/258 (1.9%) (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.30-3.51).
Conclusion: In women with term singleton pregnancy, induction of labor using a 30-mL Foley catheter is not associated with an increased risk of PTB in a subsequent pregnancy, as compared to induction of labor using prostaglandins. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Keywords: Foley catheter; balloon; cervical ripening; induction of labor; preterm birth.
© 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Methods of induction of labor in women with obesity: A secondary analysis of two multicenter randomized controlled trials.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Mar;103(3):470-478. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14737. Epub 2024 Jan 6. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024. PMID: 38183287 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of various induction methods on adverse outcomes in small for gestational age neonates: A secondary analysis of the PROBAAT 1 and 2 trials.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Mar;282:89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Jan 5. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023. PMID: 36701821
-
Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Nov;5(11):101142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101142. Epub 2023 Aug 27. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023. PMID: 37643690 Clinical Trial.
-
Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor: individual participant data meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb;57(2):215-223. doi: 10.1002/uog.23563. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33258514
-
Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol: randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-M study) and systematic review and meta-analysis of literature.Am J Perinatol. 2014 Feb;31(2):145-56. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1341573. Epub 2013 Apr 5. Am J Perinatol. 2014. PMID: 23564065 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Births: Final data for 2014. National vital statistics reports. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2015. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/36961. - PubMed
-
- NHS Digital . NHS Maternity Statistics 2016–2017. https://files.digital.nhs.uk/pdf/l/1/hosp‐epis‐stat‐mat‐repo‐2016‐17.pdf.
-
- Jozwiak M, Oude Rengerink K, Benthem M, van Beek E, Dijksterhuis MG, de Graaf IM, van Huizen ME, Oudijk MA, Papatsonis DN, Perquin DA, Porath M, van der Post JA, Rijnders RJ, Scheepers HC, Spaanderman ME, van Pampus MG, de Leeuw JW, Mol BW, Bloemenkamp KW. Foleycatheter vs prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labor at term (PROBAAT‐trial): an open label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 378: 2095–2103. - PubMed
-
- Lemmers M, Verschoor MA, Hooker AB, Opmeer BC, Limpens J, Huirne JA, Ankum WM, Mol BW. Dilatation and curettage increases the risk of subsequent preterm birth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Hum Reprod 2016; 31: 34–45. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources