Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;19(2):165-171.
doi: 10.1002/msc.1514. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A survey of current practice (2020)

Chris Littlewood  1 , Bruno Mazuquin  1 , Maria Moffatt  1 , Marcus Bateman  2
Affiliations

Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A survey of current practice (2020)

Chris Littlewood et al. Musculoskeletal Care. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Approaches to rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair are variable but typically include 4-6 weeks of immobilisation followed by a gradual introduction of movement and activity. However, research has questioned whether such an approach is optimal. The aim of this study was to undertake an updated survey to understand whether practice has evolved in line with contemporary research.

Methods: An electronic survey was developed describing three case scenarios (medium-sized rotator cuff repair [2 cm], large-sized rotator cuff repair [4 cm] and large-sized rotator cuff repair with biceps tenodesis). Clinicians involved with rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair were invited to participate.

Results: 129 responses were received (United Kingdom = 87, other regions [ORs] = 42). Respondents would most commonly recommend four to six weeks of immobilisation for all case scenarios. Passive movement would commence during this period, with active movement recommended from four to six weeks. Resisted exercise would commence between seven to 12 weeks along with return to driving. There were some minor differences in recommendations between respondents from the United Kingdom and ORs, including a greater proportion from the United Kingdom recommending sling immobilisation rather than abduction brace immobilisation.

Conclusion: For many respondents to this survey, rehabilitation for the three case scenarios was similar and has not evolved in line with contemporary research evidence. The reasons behind this need to be explored and incorporated into the design of future research evaluating rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair.

Keywords: physiotherapy; rehabilitation; rotator cuff repair; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES
    1. Coda, R., Cheema, S., Hermanns, C., Tarakemeh, A., Vopat, M., Kramer, M., … Vopat, B. (2020). A review of online rehabilitation protocols. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 2(3), e277-e288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.03.006
    1. Cohen, B., Romeo, A., & Bach, B. (2002). Rehabilitation of the shoulder after rotator-cuff repair. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics, 12(3), 218-224.
    1. Doherty, C., Bleakley, C., Delahunt, E., & Holden, S. (2017). Treatment and prevention of acute and recurrent ankle sprain: An overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096178
    1. Funk, L. (2012). Arthroscopic shoulder surgery has progressed, has the rehabilitation? International Musculoskeletal Medicine, 34(4), 141-145.
    1. Kane, L. T., Lazarus, M., Namdari, S., Seitz, A., & Abboud, J. (2020). Comparing expert opinion within the care team regarding postoperative rehabilitation protocol following rotator cuff repair. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 29(9), e330-e337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.097

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources