Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography virtual endoscopy and flexible fibre-optic laryngoscopy in the evaluation of neck anatomic structures and neoplasms
- PMID: 32940129
- PMCID: PMC7868588
- DOI: 10.1177/1971400920957232
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography virtual endoscopy and flexible fibre-optic laryngoscopy in the evaluation of neck anatomic structures and neoplasms
Abstract
Background and purpose: Computed tomography virtual endoscopy (CT-VE) is a non-invasive technique which allows visualisation of intraluminal surfaces by tridimensional reconstruction of air/soft tissues. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CT-VE and flexible fibre-optic laryngoscopy (FFL) in identifying normal neck anatomic structures and pharyngeal and laryngeal lesions.
Methods: Forty-two patients with a history of neck cancer were assessed by two ENT surgeons using FFL and by one neuroradiologist using CT-VE in order to evaluate the visualisation of the epiglottis, vallecula, glossoepiglottic folds, pyriform sinuses, vocal cords and mass pathology. The visualisation of the structures in both modalities was assessed according to the following score: 0 = not visualised, 1 = partial visualisation, 2 = complete and clear visualisation. A weighted kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the inter-observer agreement. McNemar's test was performed to compare the two diagnostic tests.
Results: The inter-observer agreement between FFL and CT-VE was fair in the assessment of the vocal cords (k = 0.341); moderate in the assessment of the glossoepiglottic folds (k = 0.418), epiglottis (k = 0.513) and pyriform sinuses (k = 0.477); and substantial in the assessment of the vallecula (k = 0.618) and the tumour (0.740). McNemar's test showed no significant difference between the two tests (p<0.05).
Conclusion: CT-VE is a non-invasive technique with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to FFL in terms of visualisation of anatomical structures and pharyngeal and laryngeal lesions.
Keywords: Computed tomography; flexible fibre-optic laryngoscopy; virtual endoscopy.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Virtual versus conventional laryngeal endoscopy.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006 Mar;115(3):182-5. doi: 10.1177/000348940611500304. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006. PMID: 16572606
-
Virtual laryngoscopy--preliminary experience.Eur J Radiol. 2005 Oct;56(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.02.006. Eur J Radiol. 2005. PMID: 16168262
-
Virtual 3-D ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT panendoscopy for assessment of the upper airways of head and neck cancer patients: a feasibility study.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Sep;39(9):1435-40. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2152-6. Epub 2012 Jun 5. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012. PMID: 22669254
-
[High-resolution virtual laryngoscopy based on spiral CT data].Radiologe. 1998 Oct;38(10):810-5. doi: 10.1007/s001170050428. Radiologe. 1998. PMID: 9830660 Review. German.
-
Transcutaneous laryngeal ultrasonography: a reliable, non-invasive and inexpensive preoperative method in the evaluation of vocal cords motility-a prospective multicentric analysis on a large series and a literature review.Updates Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):885-892. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00728-3. Epub 2020 Mar 2. Updates Surg. 2020. PMID: 32124271 Review.
Cited by
-
Topical Anaesthesia Using a Soft Mist Spray Device Allows Comfortable Awake Visualisation of the Airway via Self-Videolaryngoscopy in Volunteers.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jan 19;60(1):176. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010176. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 38276056 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chen Y-P, Chan AT, Le Q-T, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 2019; 394: 64–80. - PubMed
-
- Cohen N, Fedewa S, Chen AY. Epidemiology and demographics of the head and neck cancer population. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2018; 30: 381–395. - PubMed
-
- National Institutes of Health and US Department of Health and Human Services. SEER: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 2005.
-
- Georgopoulos R, Liu JC. Examination of the patient with head and neck cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2015; 24: 409–421. - PubMed
-
- Juliano A, Moonis G. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance in head and neck cancer: when to use what and image optimization strategies. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2018; 26: 63–84. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous