Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;37(3):675-682.
doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01867-2. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

The Treatment Decision-making Preferences of Patients with Prostate Cancer Should Be Recorded in Research and Clinical Routine: a Pooled Analysis of Four Survey Studies with 7169 Patients

Affiliations

The Treatment Decision-making Preferences of Patients with Prostate Cancer Should Be Recorded in Research and Clinical Routine: a Pooled Analysis of Four Survey Studies with 7169 Patients

Andreas Ihrig et al. J Cancer Educ. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Different patients want to take different roles in the treatment decision-making process; these roles can be classified as passive, collaborative, and active. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between decision-making preferences among patients with prostate cancer and personal, disease-related, and structural factors. In four survey studies, we asked 7169 prostate cancer patients about their decision-making preferences using the Control Preferences Scale (CPS) and collected clinical, psychological, and quality-of-life measures. Most patients (62.2%) preferred collaborative decision-making, while 2322 (32.4%) preferred an active role, and only 391 (5.5%) preferred a passive role. Age (p < 0.001), data collection mode (p < 0.001), peer-to-peer support (p = 0.018), treatment status (p < 0.001), performed or planned radical prostatectomy (p < 0.001), metastatic disease (p = 0.001), and quality of life (p < 0.001) showed significant associations with patients' preferred decision-making roles. Oncologic risk group, anxiety, and depression were not significant in the model. In particular, younger prostate cancer patients with higher quality of life completing an online survey want to play a more active role in treatment decision-making. Before treatment has started, patients tend to prefer collaborative decision-making. Few prostate cancer patients in Germany prefer a passive role. These patients are mostly older patients, patients with a metastatic disease, and patients who have opted for prostatectomy. Whether this finding reflects a generational effect or a tendency by age group and disease phase should be investigated. Further research is also needed to describe the causalities of these relationships. The CPS offers valuable information for personal counselling and should be applied in clinical routine. In a large group of patients with prostate cancer, we found that there is a strong desire for joint decision-making with the physician before the actual treatment. Especially younger men, men with active online behaviour, and men with a high quality of life want to be actively involved in therapy decision-making processes.

Keywords: Health services research; Prostate cancer; Treatment decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Significant variables of the common slopes cumulative logit model (N = 6703)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29(3):21–43. - PubMed
    1. Cuypers M, Lamers RED, de Vries M, Husson O, Kil PJM, van de Poll-Franse LV. Prostate cancer survivors with a passive role preference in treatment decision-making are less satisfied with information received: results from the PROFILES registry. Urol Oncol. 2016;34(11):482 e411–482 e418. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.06.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Stam MA, Pieterse AH, van der Poel HG, Bosch J, Tillier C, Horenblas S, Aaronson NK. Shared decision-making in prostate cancer care: encouraging every patient to be actively involved in decision-making, or ensuring patients’ preferred level of involvement? J Urol. 2018;200:582–589. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.3091. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jayadevappa R, Chhatre S, Gallo JJ, Wittink M, Morales KH, Lee DI, Guzzo TJ, Vapiwala N, Wong Y-N, Newman DK. Patient-centered preference assessment to improve satisfaction with care among patients with localized prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(12):964–973. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01091. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baunacke M, Schmidt M-L, Groeben C, Borkowetz A, Thomas C, Koch R, Chun FK, Ihrig A, Weissbach L, Huber J (2019) Decision regret after radical prostatectomy does not depend upon surgical approach: 6-year follow-up of a large German cohort undergoing routine care. J Urol. 10.1097/JU.0000000000000541 - PubMed

Publication types