Development of a Model to Predict Healing of Chronic Wounds Within 12 Weeks
- PMID: 32941121
- PMCID: PMC7522633
- DOI: 10.1089/wound.2019.1091
Development of a Model to Predict Healing of Chronic Wounds Within 12 Weeks
Abstract
Objective: Chronic wounds represent a highly prevalent but little recognized condition with substantial implications for patients and payers. While better wound care products and treatment modalities are known to improve healing rates, they are inconsistently used in real-world practice. Predicting healing rates of chronic wounds and comparing to actual rates could be used to detect and reward better quality of care. We developed a prediction model for chronic wound healing. Approach: We analyzed electronic medical records (EMRs) for 620,356 chronic wounds of various etiologies in 261,398 patients from 532 wound care clinics in the United States. Patient-level and wound-level parameters influencing wound healing were identified from prior research and clinician input. Logistic regression and classification tree models to predict the probability of wound healing within 12 weeks were developed using a random sample of 70% of the wounds and validated in the remaining data. Results: A total of 365,659 (58.9%) wounds were healed by week 12. The logistic and classification tree models predicted healing with an area under the curve of 0.712 and 0.717, respectively. Wound-level characteristics, such as location, area, depth, and etiology, were more powerful predictors than patient demographics and comorbidities. Innovation: The probability of wound healing can be predicted with reasonable accuracy in real-world data from EMRs. Conclusion: The resulting severity adjustment model can become the basis for applications like quality measure development, research into clinical practice and performance-based payment.
Keywords: chronic wounds; electronic medical records; prediction; real-world data; risk scale.
Conflict of interest statement
S.M. serves on the board of directors of Senscio Systems, Inc., and the scientific advisory board of AiCure Technologies, Boston Millennia Partners, and Zano Zano Healthcare Services. He has received consulting fees from AARP, Biotronik, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, and Defined Health. H.G., M.S., and W.E. are employees of Healogics, Inc. S.K.C. reports no disclosures.
Figures
References
-
- Lazarus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, et al. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Wound Repair Regen 1994;2:165–170 - PubMed
-
- Coleman S, Nelson EA, Vowden P, et al. Development of a generic wound care assessment minimum data set. J Tissue Viability 2017;26:226–240 - PubMed
-
- Fife CE, Carter MJ, Walker D, Thomson B. Wound care outcomes and associated cost among patients treated in US out-patient wound centers: data from the US wound registry. Wounds 2012;24:10–17 - PubMed
-
- Nussbaum SR, Carter MJ, Fife CE, et al. An economic evaluation of the impact, cost, and medicare policy implications of chronic nonhealing wounds. Value Health 2018;21:27–32 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
