Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov;32(6):463-471.
doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000747.

Novel classifications for systemic sclerosis: challenging historical subsets to unlock new doors

Affiliations
Review

Novel classifications for systemic sclerosis: challenging historical subsets to unlock new doors

Vincent Sobanski et al. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a severe rheumatic disease characterized by a considerable heterogeneity in clinical presentations and pathophysiological mechanisms. This variability has a substantial impact on morbidity and mortality and limits the generalizability of clinical trial results. This review aims to highlight recent studies that have proposed new innovative approaches to decipher this heterogeneity, in particular, by attempting to optimize disease classification.

Recent findings: The historical dichotomy limited/diffuse subsets based on cutaneous involvement has been challenged by studies highlighting an underestimated heterogeneity between these two subtypes and showing that presence of organ damage and autoantibody profiles markedly influenced survival beyond skin extension. Advanced computational methods using unsupervised machine learning analyses of clinical variables and/or high-throughput omics technologies, clinical variables trajectories modelling overtime or radiomics have provided significant insights on key pathogenic processes that could help defining new subgroups beyond the diffuse/limited subsets.

Summary: We can anticipate that a future classification of SSc patients will integrate innovative approaches encompassing clinical phenotypes, variables trajectories, serological features and innovative omics molecular signatures. It nevertheless seems crucial to also pursue the implementation and standardization of readily available and easy to use tools that can be used in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Systemic sclerosis: advances and prospects. Lancet 2017; 390:1624.
    1. Denton CP, Khanna D. Systemic sclerosis. Lancet 2017; 390:1685–1699.
    1. Pope JE. The future of treatment in systemic sclerosis: can we design better trials? Lancet Rheumatol 2020; 2:e185–e194.
    1. Johnson SR, Soowamber ML, Fransen J, et al. There is a need for new systemic sclerosis subset criteria. A content analytic approach. Scand J Rheumatol 2017; 47:62–70.
    1. Aggarwal R, Ringold S, Khanna D, et al. Distinctions between diagnostic and classification criteria?: diagnostic criteria in rheumatology. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015; 67:891–897.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources