Liability of Health Care Professionals and Institutions During COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Symposium Proceedings and Position Statement
- PMID: 32941344
- PMCID: PMC7678349
- DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000793
Liability of Health Care Professionals and Institutions During COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Symposium Proceedings and Position Statement
Abstract
Background: On May 12, 2020, a symposium titled "Liability of healthcare professionals and institutions during COVID-19 pandemic" was held in Italy with the participation of national experts in malpractice law, hospital management, legal medicine, and clinical risk management. The symposium's rationale was the highly likely inflation of criminal and civil proceedings concerning alleged errors committed by health care professionals and decision makers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Its aim was to identify and discuss the main issues of legal and medicolegal interest and thus to find solid solutions in the spirit of preparedness planning.
Methods: There were 5 main points of discussion: (A) how to judge errors committed during the pandemic because of the application of protocols and therapies based on no or weak evidence of efficacy, (B) whether hospital managers can be considered liable for infected health care professionals who were not given adequate personal protective equipment, (C) whether health care professionals and institutions can be considered liable for cases of infected inpatients who claim that the infection was transmitted in a hospital setting, (D) whether health care institutions and hospital managers can be considered liable for the hotspots in long-term care facilities/care homes, and (E) whether health care institutions and hospital managers can be considered liable for the worsening of chronic diseases.
Results and conclusion: Limitation of the liability to the cases of gross negligence (with an explicit definition of this term), a no-fault system with statal indemnities for infected cases, and a rigorous methodology for the expert witnesses were proposed as key interventions for successfully facing future proceedings.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors disclose no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Epicentro—Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Dati epidemiologici: infografica giornaliera. Available at: https://www.epicentro.iss.it/coronavirus. Accessed May 26, 2020.
-
- di Luca A Vetrugno G Pascali VL, et al. Perspectives on patient safety and medical malpractice: a comparison of medical and legal systems in Italy and the United States. J Patient Saf. 2019;15:e78–e81. - PubMed
-
- Kachalia A Little A Isavoran M, et al. Greatest impact of safe harbor rule may be to improve patient safety, not reduce liability claims paid by physicians. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33:59–66. - PubMed
-
- Caputo M. Le ‘sabbie mobili’ dell’imperizia e la ‘viscosità’ dell’art. 590-sexiesc.p. Considerazioni de lege latae de lege ferenda. Riv Ital Med Leg. 2019;1:443–461.
-
- Oliva A, Grassi S, Pascali VL. The negligence after Law nr. 24/2017: clear boundaries are needed to grant a safe harbor. Riv Ital Med Leg. 2019;1:429–441.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
