Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):880.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05728-y.

Strategic management in local hospital markets: service duplication or service differentiation

Affiliations

Strategic management in local hospital markets: service duplication or service differentiation

Hanh Q Trinh. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to assess the influences of market structure on hospitals' strategic decision to duplicate or differentiate services and to assess the relationship of duplication and differentiation to hospital performance. This study is different from previous research because it examines how a hospital decides which services to be duplicated or differentiated in a dyadic relationship embedded in a complex competitive network.

Methods: We use Linear Structural Equations (LISREL) to simultaneously estimate the relationships among market structure, duplicated and differentiated services, and performance. All non-federal, general acute hospitals in urban counties in the United States with more than one hospital are included in the sample (n = 1726). Forty-two high-tech services are selected for the study. Data are compiled from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey of Hospitals, Area Resource File, and CMS cost report files. State data from HealthLeaders-InterStudy for 2015 are also used.

Results: The findings provide support that hospitals duplicate and differentiate services relative to rivals in a local market. Size asymmetry between hospitals is related to both service duplication (negatively) and service differentiation (positively). With greater size asymmetry, a hospital utilizes its valuable resources for its own advantage to thwart competition from rivals by differentiating more high-tech services and reducing service duplication. Geographic distance is positively related to service duplication, with duplication increasing as distance between hospitals increases. Market competition is associated with lower service duplication. Both service differentiation and service duplication are associated with lower market share, higher costs, and lower profits.

Conclusions: The findings underscore the role of market structure as a check and balance on the provision of high-tech services. Hospital management should consider cutting back some services that are oversupplied and/or unprofitable and analyze the supply and demand in the market to avoid overdoing both service duplication and service differentiation.

Keywords: High-tech services; Hospital services; Hospital strategy; Service differentiation; Service duplication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that he/she does not have competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Luke RD. Spatial competition and cooperation in local hospital markets. Med Care Rev. 1991;48(2):207–237. doi: 10.1177/002570879104800204. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Connor RA, Feldman RD, Dowd BE. The effects of market concentration and horizontal mergers on hospital costs and prices. Int J Econ Bus. 1998;52(2):159–180. doi: 10.1080/13571519884495. - DOI
    1. Devers KJ, Brewster LR, Casalino LP. Changes in hospital competitive strategy: a new medical arms race? Health Serv Res. 2003;38(1 Pt, II):447–469. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00124. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morrisey MA. Competition in hospital and health insurance markets: a review and research agenda. Health Serv Res. 2001;36(1):191–222. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trinh HQ, Begun JW, Luke RD. Hospital service duplication: evidence on the medical arms race. Health Care Manag Rev. 2008;33(3):192–202. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000324903.19272.0c. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources