Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov-Dec;61(6):607-615.
doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 27.

Coronavirus and Its Implications for Psychiatry: A Rapid Review of the Early Literature

Affiliations
Review

Coronavirus and Its Implications for Psychiatry: A Rapid Review of the Early Literature

Maximilliam A Cabrera et al. Psychosomatics. 2020 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus pandemic has changed health care rapidly and dramatically.

Objective: To provide a critical synthesis of the scientific literature on the pandemic's implications for psychiatric practice.

Methods: A rapid literature review was undertaken to identify scientific literature linking psychiatric outcomes and practice changes due to coronavirus and the disease it causes (COVID-19). A structured quality assessment was used to assess those articles reporting quantitative data.

Results: Fifty articles were identified for inclusion, but only 12 contained original data. Eleven of those twelve were rated as of weak quality. The literature described psychiatric sequelae of the coronavirus and related public health interventions through cross-sectional surveys among different populations; no studies include diagnostic or functional impairment data. Populations at risk include COVID-19 survivors, health care workers, the elderly, and those with preexisting psychiatric disease. Impacts on psychiatric practice were described, again without data on changes to quality or access of care.

Conclusions: There is a quickly accumulating body of evidence on the psychiatric implications of coronavirus including psychological effects on the general public and at-risk subgroups. Similarly, psychiatric practice has witnessed substantial adaptation to the pandemic. However, there remain significant gaps in scientific knowledge. We suggest opportunities for consultation-liaison psychiatry to improve the understanding of the relationship between coronavirus and psychiatric care.

Keywords: COVID-19; anxiety; mental health; patients; psychiatry; telepsychiatry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Diagram for Literature Search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Publications by Study Type (n = 50).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Publications by Country of Origin (n = 50).

Comment in

  • Long COVID and Its Psychiatric Aspects.
    Sancak B, Ozer Agirbas U, Kilic C. Sancak B, et al. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2021 Jul-Aug;62(4):480-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 29. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 33817685 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Arden M.A., Chilcot J. Health psychology and the coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic: a call for research. Br J Health Psychol. 2020;25:231–232. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torales J., O'Higgins M., Castaldelli-Maia J.M. The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;66:317–320. - PubMed
    1. Tricco A.C., Antony J., Zarin W. A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Med. 2015;13:224. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arksey H., O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Social Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.
    1. Armijo-Olivo S., Stiles C.R., Hagen N.A. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane collaboration risk of Bias Tool and the effective public health practice Project quality assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18:12–18. - PubMed