Statistical Analysis of Clinical COVID-19 Data: A Concise Overview of Lessons Learned, Common Errors and How to Avoid Them
- PMID: 32943941
- PMCID: PMC7478365
- DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S256735
Statistical Analysis of Clinical COVID-19 Data: A Concise Overview of Lessons Learned, Common Errors and How to Avoid Them
Abstract
By definition, in-hospital patient data are restricted to the time between hospital admission and discharge (alive or dead). For hospitalised cases of COVID-19, a number of events during hospitalization are of interest regarding the influence of risk factors on the likelihood of experiencing these events. The same is true for predicting times from hospital admission of COVID-19 patients to intensive care or from start of ventilation (invasive or non-invasive) to extubation. This logical restriction of the data to the period of hospitalisation is associated with a substantial risk that inappropriate methods are used for analysis. Here, we briefly discuss the most common types of bias which can occur when analysing in-hospital COVID-19 data.
Keywords: competing events; competing risk bias; immortal-time bias; time-dependent bias; time-to-event analysis; time-varying exposure.
© 2020 Wolkewitz et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest for this work.
References
-
- Schumacher M, Allignol A, Beyersmann J, Binder N, Wolkewitz M. Hospital-acquired infections: appropriate statistical treatment is urgently needed. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1502–1508. - PubMed
-
- Wolkewitz M, Harbarth S, Beyersmann J. Daily Chlorhexidine Bathing and Hospital-Acquired Infection. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2330–2332. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
