NeuroSAFE technique-pathological considerations and practical implications for guiding nerve-sparing surgery in prostate cancer patients
- PMID: 32945017
- DOI: 10.1111/his.14183
NeuroSAFE technique-pathological considerations and practical implications for guiding nerve-sparing surgery in prostate cancer patients
Keywords: NeuroSAFE; frozen section; nerve-sparing; potency; prostate cancer; robotic prostatectomy.
Comment on
-
Intraoperative assessment and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens to guide nerve-sparing surgery in prostate cancer patients (NeuroSAFE).Histopathology. 2020 Oct;77(4):539-547. doi: 10.1111/his.14184. Epub 2020 Sep 3. Histopathology. 2020. PMID: 32557744 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009; 374; 1105-1112.
-
- Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Br Med J 2014; 348; g1687.
-
- Johnson BS, Fladie I, Jellison S, McMurray M, Narayan V, Vassar M. Quality of intervention reporting in randomized clinical trials published in urology journals. Eur Urol 2020; 77; 296-298.
-
- Dinneen EP, Van Der Slot M, Adasonla K et al. Intraoperative frozen section for margin evaluation during radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 6; 664-673.
-
- Dev HS, Wiklund P, Patel V et al. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2015; 33; 109.e7-109.e13.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
