Development of the Basic Auditory Skills Evaluation Battery for Online Testing of Cochlear Implant Listeners
- PMID: 32946250
- PMCID: PMC7838832
- DOI: 10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00083
Development of the Basic Auditory Skills Evaluation Battery for Online Testing of Cochlear Implant Listeners
Abstract
Purpose Cochlear implant (CI) performance varies considerably across individuals and across domains of auditory function, but clinical testing is typically restricted to speech intelligibility. The goals of this study were (a) to develop a basic auditory skills evaluation battery of tests for comprehensive assessment of ecologically relevant aspects of auditory perception and (b) to compare CI listeners' performance on the battery when tested in the laboratory by an audiologist or independently at home. Method The battery included 17 tests to evaluate (a) basic spectrotemporal processing, (b) processing of music and environmental sounds, and (c) speech perception in both quiet and background noise. The battery was administered online to three groups of adult listeners: two groups of postlingual CI listeners and a group of older normal-hearing (ONH) listeners of similar age. The ONH group and one CI group were tested in a laboratory by an audiologist, whereas the other CI group self-tested independently at home following online instructions. Results Results indicated a wide range in the performance of CI but not ONH listeners. Significant differences were not found between the two CI groups on any test, whereas on all but two tests, CI listeners' performance was lower than that of the ONH participants. Principal component analysis revealed that four components accounted for 82% of the variance in measured results, with component loading indicating that the test battery successfully captures differences across dimensions of auditory perception. Conclusions These results provide initial support for the use of the basic auditory skills evaluation battery for comprehensive online assessment of auditory skills in adult CI listeners.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):618-26. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318174e787. Ear Hear. 2008. PMID: 18469714 Free PMC article.
-
Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):445-58. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820510b7. Ear Hear. 2011. PMID: 21258238 Clinical Trial.
-
Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 May;23(5):350-65; quiz 379. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.5.6. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012. PMID: 22533978 Free PMC article.
-
Music enjoyment with cochlear implantation.Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018 Oct;45(5):895-902. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.11.008. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018. PMID: 29519690 Review.
-
Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.Trends Amplif. 2004;8(2):49-82. doi: 10.1177/108471380400800203. Trends Amplif. 2004. PMID: 15497033 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users.J Clin Med. 2021 May 13;10(10):2093. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102093. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34068067 Free PMC article.
-
Perception of Environmental Sounds in Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Review.Front Neurosci. 2022 Jan 10;15:788899. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.788899. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35082595 Free PMC article.
-
Reward Enhances Online Participants' Engagement With a Demanding Auditory Task.Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211025941. doi: 10.1177/23312165211025941. Trends Hear. 2021. PMID: 34170748 Free PMC article.
-
Speech Recognition in Noise Performance Measured Remotely Versus In-Laboratory From Older and Younger Listeners.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Jun 8;65(6):2391-2397. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00557. Epub 2022 Apr 20. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022. PMID: 35442717 Free PMC article.
-
A Longitudinal Comparison of Environmental Sound Recognition in Adults With Hearing Aids Before and After Cochlear Implantation.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Mar 17;64(3):1040-1052. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00400. Epub 2021 Mar 2. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021. PMID: 33651956 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Auditory Potential. (2011). New Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB) for adult cochlear implant users 2011. http://www.auditorypotential.com/MSTBfiles/MSTBManual2011-06-20%20.pdf
-
- Bai Z., & Stephens D. (2005). Subjective outcome measures after cochlear implantation: Overall measures. Audio-logical Medicine, 3(4), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/16513860500474476
-
- Bench J., Kowal A., & Bamford J. (1979). The BKB (Bamford–Kowal–Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. British Journal of Audiology, 13(3), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.3109/03005367909078884 - PubMed
-
- Bradlow A. R. (n.d.). SpeechBox. https://speechbox.linguistics.northwestern.edu
-
- Chatterjee M., Zion D. J., Deroche M. L., Burianek B. A., Limb C. J., Goren A. P., Kulkarni A. M., & Christensen J. A. (2015). Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers. Hearing Research, 322, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.003 - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical