Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 18;29(3S):577-590.
doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00083. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

Development of the Basic Auditory Skills Evaluation Battery for Online Testing of Cochlear Implant Listeners

Affiliations

Development of the Basic Auditory Skills Evaluation Battery for Online Testing of Cochlear Implant Listeners

Valeriy Shafiro et al. Am J Audiol. .

Abstract

Purpose Cochlear implant (CI) performance varies considerably across individuals and across domains of auditory function, but clinical testing is typically restricted to speech intelligibility. The goals of this study were (a) to develop a basic auditory skills evaluation battery of tests for comprehensive assessment of ecologically relevant aspects of auditory perception and (b) to compare CI listeners' performance on the battery when tested in the laboratory by an audiologist or independently at home. Method The battery included 17 tests to evaluate (a) basic spectrotemporal processing, (b) processing of music and environmental sounds, and (c) speech perception in both quiet and background noise. The battery was administered online to three groups of adult listeners: two groups of postlingual CI listeners and a group of older normal-hearing (ONH) listeners of similar age. The ONH group and one CI group were tested in a laboratory by an audiologist, whereas the other CI group self-tested independently at home following online instructions. Results Results indicated a wide range in the performance of CI but not ONH listeners. Significant differences were not found between the two CI groups on any test, whereas on all but two tests, CI listeners' performance was lower than that of the ONH participants. Principal component analysis revealed that four components accounted for 82% of the variance in measured results, with component loading indicating that the test battery successfully captures differences across dimensions of auditory perception. Conclusions These results provide initial support for the use of the basic auditory skills evaluation battery for comprehensive online assessment of auditory skills in adult CI listeners.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Box plots of the three tests of spectrotemporal processing with data from the current study plotted together with data collected separately for the same tests in earlier studies that used the same test format (Sheft, Risley, & Shafiro, 2012; Sheft, Shafiro, et al., 2012). The study participants are older listeners with normal hearing (ONH) and listeners with cochlear implant (CI). Participants from the previous studies are young listeners with normal hearing (YNH) and older listers with hearing impairment (OHI). SNR = signal-to-noise ratio; FM = frequency modulated.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percent correct, P(c), scores across signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels in three speech-in-noise tests. Filled diamonds represent mean scores of cochlear implant listeners, combined across both cochlear implant groups, whereas filled circles represent mean scores of older normal-hearing listeners. Error bars represent ± 2 SEM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Auditory Potential. (2011). New Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB) for adult cochlear implant users 2011. http://www.auditorypotential.com/MSTBfiles/MSTBManual2011-06-20%20.pdf
    1. Bai Z., & Stephens D. (2005). Subjective outcome measures after cochlear implantation: Overall measures. Audio-logical Medicine, 3(4), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/16513860500474476
    1. Bench J., Kowal A., & Bamford J. (1979). The BKB (Bamford–Kowal–Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. British Journal of Audiology, 13(3), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.3109/03005367909078884 - PubMed
    1. Bradlow A. R. (n.d.). SpeechBox. https://speechbox.linguistics.northwestern.edu
    1. Chatterjee M., Zion D. J., Deroche M. L., Burianek B. A., Limb C. J., Goren A. P., Kulkarni A. M., & Christensen J. A. (2015). Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers. Hearing Research, 322, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.003 - PMC - PubMed