Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 18;15(9):e0239329.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239329. eCollection 2020.

Genetic testing offer for inherited neuromuscular diseases within the EURO-NMD reference network: A European survey study

Affiliations

Genetic testing offer for inherited neuromuscular diseases within the EURO-NMD reference network: A European survey study

Borut Peterlin et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The genetic diagnostics of inherited neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) is challenging due to their clinical and genetic heterogeneity. We launched an online survey within the EURO-NMD European Reference Network (ERN) to collect information about the availability/distribution of genetic testing across 61 ERN health care providers (HCPs). A 17 items questionnaire was designed to address methods used, the number of genetic tests available, the clinical pathway to access genetic testing, the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and participation to quality assessment schemes (QAs). A remarkable number of HCPs (49%) offers ≥ 500 genetic tests per year, 43,6% offers 100-500 genetic tests per year, and 7,2% ≤ 100 per year. NGS is used by 94% of centres, Sanger sequencing by 84%, MLPA by 66% and Southern blotting by 36%. The majority of centres (60%) offer NGS for all patients that fulfil criteria for NMD of genetic origin. Pipelines for NGS vary amongst centres, even within the same national system. Referral of patients to genetic laboratories by specialists was frequently reported (58%), and 65% of centres participates in genetic testing QAs. We specifically evaluated how many centres cover SMA, DMD, Pompe, LGMDs, and TTR genes/diseases genetic diagnosis, since these rare diseases benefit from personalised therapies. We used the Orphanet EUGT numbers, provided by 82% of HCPs. SMA, DMD, LGMD, TTR and GAA genes are covered by EUGTs although with different numbers and modalities. The number of genetic tests for NMDs offered across HCPs National Health systems is quite high, including routine techniques and NGS. The number and type of tests offered and the clinical practices differ among centres. We provided evidence that survey tools might be useful to learn about the state-of-the-art of ERN health-related activities and to foster harmonisation and standardisation of the complex care for the rare disease patients in the EU.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Availability of genetic test for NMDs in European Countries within Euro-NMD and most commonly used techniques: a) number of genetic tests (of all kinds) for NMDs performed in Euro-NMD HCPs; b) coverage of genetic tests for NMDs in Euro-HCPs; c) most commonly used technologies for NMDs diagnosis.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Impact of NGS in NMDs diagnosis and flowcharts for NGS testing: a) contribution of NGS to all genetic tests for rare NMDs in Euro-NMD HCPs; b) criteria for offering NGS approach; c) NGS prioritization in diagnostic algorithms; d) clinical pathway to refer patients for NGS testing.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Euro-NMD centers strategies for reporting variants of uncertain significance (VOUS) and incidental findings and for validating NGS variants: a) centre’s approach to VOUS; b) centre’s approach to incidental findings; c) use of Sanger sequencing validation of NGS identified variants.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Social and economic aspects of NGS method application within Euro-NMD: a) NGS experience in Euro-NMD centers; b) experienced barriers for NGS implementation; c) activities needed to NGS implementation.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Testing of selected RDs across Euro-NMD consortium centres providing unique EUGT number.
For each disease, the percentage of centres offering diagnosis, distribution of centres across European countries and technologies used are reported. a) SMN genes testing; b) DMD gene testing; c) LGMDs genes (SGCs: Sarcoglycan α, β, γ; CAPN3: Calpain3,DYSF: dysferlin; ANO5: anoctamin 5);d) GAA gene; e) TTR gene testing.

References

    1. Deenen JCW, Horlings CGC, Verschuuren JJGM, Verbeek ALM, Van Engelen BGM. The epidemiology of neuromuscular disorders: A comprehensive overview of the literature. J Neuromuscul Disord. 2015;2(1):73–85. - PubMed
    1. Benarroch L, Bonne G, Rivier F, Hamroun D. The 2020 version of the gene table of neuromuscular disorders (nuclear genome). Neuromuscul Disord. 2019;29(12):980–1018. 10.1016/j.nmd.2019.10.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, Connolly AM, Kuntz NL, Kirschner J,et al. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(18):1723–1732. 10.1056/NEJMoa1702752 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dai Y, Wei X, Zhao Y, Ren H, Lan Z, Yang Y, et al. A comprehensive genetic diagnosis of Chinese muscular dystrophy and congenital myopathy patients by targeted next-generation sequencing. Neuromuscul Disord [Internet]. 2015;25(8):617–624. 10.1016/j.nmd.2015.03.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Savarese M, Di Fruscio G, Magri F, Fanin M, Ruggiero L, Ricci G, et al. The genetic basis of undiagnosed muscular dystrophies and myopathies Results from 504 patients. Neurology. 2016;87(1):71–76. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002800 - DOI - PMC - PubMed