Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021;32(1):17-20.
doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2020-040. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

A comparison of AAIR versus DDDR pacing for patients with sinus node dysfunction: a long-term follow-up study

Reuben Kato Mutagaywa  1 , Basil Tumaini  2 , Ashley Chin  3
Affiliations

A comparison of AAIR versus DDDR pacing for patients with sinus node dysfunction: a long-term follow-up study

Reuben Kato Mutagaywa et al. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2021.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcomes [atrial fibrillation (AF), atrio-ventricular (AV) block, device sepsis and lead revision] of patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) between atrial-pacing atrial-sensing inhibited-response rate-adaptive (AAIR) versus dual-chamber rate-adaptive (DDDR) pacing. The choice of AAIR pacing versus DDDR pacing was determined by AV nodal functional testing at implant.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent AAIR and DDDR pacing over a 10-year period.

Results: One hundred and sixteen patients required pacing for symptomatic SND. Fifty-four (46.6%) patients received AAIR pacemakers and 62 (53.4%) received DDDR pacemakers based on AV nodal functional testing at implant. Patients who had AV Wenkebach with atrial pacing at 120 beats per minute received DDDR pacing. Overall the mean age of patients with SND was 65 years and 66.4% were females, 30% were diabetics and 71% were hypertensives. Pre-syncope/syncope (84%) and dizziness (69%) were the most common symptoms. Sinus pauses and sinus bradycardia were the most common ECG manifestations. Over a median follow up of five (IQR: 2-11) years, four patients (7.4%) developed AF in the AAIR group compared to three (4.8%) in the DDDR group (p = 0.70). AV block occurred in one patient in the AAIR group, who required an upgrade to a DDDR pacemaker. There was no difference in device sepsis or need for lead revision between the two groups.

Conclusions: We found that AV nodal functional testing with atrial pacing at the time of pacemaker implantation was a useful tool to help guide the implanter between AAIR or DDDR pacing. Patients who underwent AAIR pacing had a low risk of AF, AV block or lead revision. In resource-limited settings, AAIR pacing guided by AV nodal functional testing should be considered as an alternative to DDDR pacing.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; atrio‐ventricular block; cardiac pacing; dual‐chamber pacing; single‐lead atrial pacing; sinus node dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rubenstein JJ, Schulman CL, Yurchak PM, Desanctis RW. Clinical spectrum of the sick sinus syndrome. Circulation. 1972;XLVI(46):5–3. - PubMed
    1. Nielsen JC. Pacing mode selection in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Dan Med Bull. 2007;54(1):1–17. - PubMed
    1. Mond HG, Irwin M, Morillo C, Ector H. The World Survey of Cardiac Pacing and Cardioverter Defibrillators: Calendar Year 2001. Vol. 27, PACE – Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2004:955–964. - PubMed
    1. Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G. et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2281–2329. - PubMed
    1. Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE. et al. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE committee) Circulation. 2002;106(16):2145–2161. - PubMed