Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Mar;21(3):1346-1347.
doi: 10.1111/ajt.16308. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

Letter to the AJT Editor re: Puttarajappa et al (doi:10.1111/ajt.16150)

Affiliations
Free article
Comment

Letter to the AJT Editor re: Puttarajappa et al (doi:10.1111/ajt.16150)

Abhijit S Grewal et al. Am J Transplant. 2021 Mar.
Free article
No abstract available

Keywords: biomarker; biopsy; clinical research/practice; editorial/personal viewpoint; kidney transplantation/nephrology; protocol biopsy; quality of care/care delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. Puttarajappa CM, Mehta RB, Roberts MS, Smith KJ, Hariharan S. Economic analysis of screening for subclinical rejection in kidney transplantation using protocol biopsies and noninvasive biomarkers [published online ahead of print 2020]. Am J Transplant. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16150.
    1. Friedewald JJ, Kurian SM, Heilman RL, et al. Development and clinical validity of a novel blood-based molecular biomarker for subclinical acute rejection following kidney transplant. Am J Transplant. 2018;19(1):98-109.
    1. Marsh CL, Kurian SM, Rice JC, et al. Application of TruGraf v1: a novel molecular biomarker for managing kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function. Transpl Proc. 2019;51(3):722-728.
    1. Bromberg JS, Brennan DC, Poggio E, et al. Biological variation of donor-derived cell-free dna in renal transplant recipients: clinical implications. J Appl Lab Med. 2017;2(3):309-321.
    1. Ahmad I. Biopsy of the transplanted kidney. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2004;21(4):275-281.