Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 16;9(9):610.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9090610.

Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein Testing to Reduce Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Review

Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein Testing to Reduce Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Nahara Anani Martínez-González et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

C-reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care testing (POCT) is increasingly being promoted to reduce diagnostic uncertainty and enhance antibiotic stewardship. In primary care, respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are the most common reason for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, which is a major driver for antibiotic resistance. We systematically reviewed the available evidence on the impact of CRP-POCT on antibiotic prescribing for RTIs in primary care. Thirteen moderate to high-quality studies comprising 9844 participants met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses showed that CRP-POCT significantly reduced immediate antibiotic prescribing at the index consultation compared with usual care (RR 0.79, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.90, p = 0.0003, I2 = 76%) but not during 28-day (n = 7) follow-up. The immediate effect was sustained at 12 months (n = 1). In children, CRP-POCT reduced antibiotic prescribing when CRP (cut-off) guidance was provided (n = 2). Meta-analyses showed significantly higher rates of re-consultation within 30 days (n = 8, 1 significant). Clinical recovery, resolution of symptoms, and hospital admissions were not significantly different between CRP-POCT and usual care. CRP-POCT can reduce immediate antibiotic prescribing for RTIs in primary care (number needed to (NNT) for benefit = 8) at the expense of increased re-consultations (NNT for harm = 27). The increase in re-consultations and longer-term effects of CRP-POCT need further evaluation. Overall, the benefits of CRP-POCT outweigh the potential harms (NNTnet = 11).

Keywords: antibiotic prescribing; antibiotic stewardship; antibiotic use; c-reactive protein; diagnostics; meta-analysis; point-of-care testing; primary care; respiratory tract infection; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study identification and process for selection of studies included in the review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison: CRP-POCT versus usual care. Overall antibiotic prescribing at index consultations. CRP, C-Reactive Protein Point Of Care Test; RCTs, Randomised Controlled Trials; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel; CI, Confidence Interval; df, degrees of freedom; I2, heterogeneity between trials.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison: CRP-POCT versus usual care. Antibiotic prescribing at index consultations by type of RTI: (a) Upper RTI; (b) Lower RTI. CRP, C-Reactive Protein Point Of Care Test; RCTs, Randomised Controlled Trials; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel; CI, Confidence Interval; df, degrees of freedom; I2, heterogeneity between trials.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison: CRP-POCT versus usual care. Antibiotic prescribing at index consultations by age group: (a) Adults; (b) Children. CRP, C-Reactive Protein Point Of Care Test; RCTs, Randomised Controlled Trials; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel; CI, Confidence Interval; df, degrees of freedom; I2, heterogeneity between trials.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison: CRP-POCT versus usual care. Antibiotic prescribing at index consultations by age group with CRP (cut-off) guidance to withhold antibiotics: (a) Adults; (b) Children. CRP values recommended to withhold antibiotics are presented within brackets. CRP, C-Reactive Protein (Point Of Care Test); RCTs, Randomised Controlled Trials; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel; CI, Confidence Interval; df, degrees of freedom; I2, heterogeneity between trials.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Measuring Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing. [(accessed on 10 June 2020)];2020 Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/community/programs-measurement/measur....
    1. Fleming-Dutra K.E., Hersh A.L., Shapiro D.J., Bartoces M., Enns E.A., File T.M., Jr., Finkelstein J.A., Gerber J.S., Hyun D.Y., Linder J.A., et al. Prevalence of Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescriptions Among US Ambulatory Care Visits, 2010–2011. JAMA. 2016;315:1864–1873. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4151. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Costelloe C., Metcalfe C., Lovering A., Mant D., Hay A.D. Effect of antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in individual patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340:c2096. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2096. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goossens H., Ferech M., Vander Stichele R., Elseviers M. Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: A cross-national database study. Lancet. 2005;365:579–587. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70799-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cars O., Högberg L.D., Murray M., Nordberg O., Sivaraman S., Lundborg C.S., So A.D., Tomson G. Meeting the challenge of antibiotic resistance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1438. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1438. - DOI - PubMed