Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 18;10(9):e038531.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038531.

Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Prevention in Tanzania (CONCEPT) study: Cohort profile

Affiliations

Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Prevention in Tanzania (CONCEPT) study: Cohort profile

Bariki Mchome et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Purpose: Cervical cancer is a major cause of death among women in Eastern Africa, and the distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) according to HIV status is inadequately characterised in this region. In order to guide future cervical cancer preventive strategies that involve HPV testing, the Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Prevention in Tanzania (CONCEPT) study was established in 2015. The CONCEPT cohort aims to investigate the natural history of HPV and determine acquisition and persistence patterns of high-risk (HR) HPV among HIV-positive and HIV-negative women. Further, the influence of lifestyle and sexual/reproductive factors will be investigated. The main objective of this article is to describe how the CONCEPT cohort was established.

Participants: Women aged 25-60 years were enrolled from cervical cancer screening clinics in Dar-es-Salaam and Moshi, Tanzania. Data were collected at baseline, at 14 months (first follow-up) and at 28 months (second follow-up). Biological samples included two cervical swabs for careHPV DNA testing, cytology, Hybrid Capture 2, genotyping and blood samples for HIV. Visual inspection with acetic acid was performed, and sociodemographic, lifestyle and sexual/reproductive characteristics were collected through a standardised questionnaire.

Findings to date: 4043 women were included in the cohort from August 2015 to May 2017. At baseline, 696 (17.1%) women were HR HPV positive, and among these, 31.6% were HIV positive; 139 women (3.4%) had high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. 3074 women (81%) attended the first follow-up. The majority attended after receiving a phone call reminder (35%) or from home via self-samples (41%). At first follow-up, 438 (14.4%) were HR HPV positive and 30.4% of these were HIV positive.

Future plans: A second follow-up is underway (17 December 2018-October 2020). We plan to integrate our data with a previous cross-sectional HPV study from Tanzania to increase the power of our findings. Researchers interested in collaborating are welcomed, either by extracting data or jointly requesting further investigation from the cohort.

Keywords: HIV & AIDS; gynaecological oncology; international health services; preventive medicine; reproductive medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of enrolment and follow-up of CONCEPT cohort.

References

    1. Organization WH Improving data for decision-making: a toolkit for cervical cancer prevention and control programmes, 2018. Available: http://apps.who.int/iris
    1. Serrano B, Brotons M, Bosch FX, et al. . Epidemiology and burden of HPV-related disease. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018;47:14–26. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.08.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Torre LA, Islami F, Siegel RL, et al. . Global cancer in women: burden and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26:444–57. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0858 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruni LB-RL AG, Serrano B. Human papillomavirus and related diseases in Tanzania.Summary report. 15 ICO Information Centre on HPV and Cancer, 2016.
    1. Fokom-Domgue J, Combescure C, Fokom-Defo V, et al. . Performance of alternative strategies for primary cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. BMJ 2015;351:h3084. 10.1136/bmj.h3084 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types