Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e038776.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038776.

Evaluation of outcome relevance of quality indicators in the emergency department (ENQuIRE): study protocol for a prospective multicentre cohort study

Affiliations

Evaluation of outcome relevance of quality indicators in the emergency department (ENQuIRE): study protocol for a prospective multicentre cohort study

Susanne Drynda et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Quality of emergency department (ED) care affects patient outcomes substantially. Quality indicators (QIs) for ED care are a major challenge due to the heterogeneity of patient populations, health care structures and processes in Germany. Although a number of quality measures are already in use, there is a paucity of data on the importance of these QIs on medium-term and long-term outcomes. The evaluation of outcome relevance of quality indicators in the emergency department study (ENQuIRE) aims to identify and investigate the relevance of QIs in the ED on patient outcomes in a 12-month follow-up.

Methods and analysis: The study is a prospective non-interventional multicentre cohort study conducted in 15 EDs throughout Germany. Included are all patients in 2019, who were ≥18 years of age, insured at the Techniker Krankenkasse (statutory health insurance (SHI)) and gave their written informed consent to the study.The primary objective of the study is to assess the effect of selected quality measures on patient outcome. The data collected for this purpose comprise medical records from the ED treatment, discharge (claims) data from hospitalised patients, a patient questionnaire to be answered 6-8 weeks after emergency admission, and outcome measures in a 12-month follow-up obtained as claims data from the SHI.Descriptive and analytical statistics will be applied to provide summaries about the characteristics of QIs and associations between quality measures and patient outcomes.

Ethics and dissemination: Approval of the leading ethics committee at the Medical Faculty of the University of Magdeburg (reference number 163/18 from 19 November 2018) has been obtained and adapted by responsible local ethics committees.The findings of this work will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts and presentations as conference contributions (abstracts, poster or oral presentations).Moreover, results will be discussed with clinical experts and medical associations before being proposed for implementation into the quality management of EDs.

Trial registration number: German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00015203); Pre-results.

Keywords: accident & emergency medicine; health & safety; health services administration & management; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study design. ED, emergency department; EDIS, ED information system; SHI, statutory health insurance; TK, Techniker Krankenkasse.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mockel M, Searle J, Muller R, et al. . Chief complaints in medical emergencies: do they relate to underlying disease and outcome? the Charité emergency medicine study (CHARITEM). Eur J Emerg Med 2013;20:103–8. 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328351e609 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greiner F, Brammen D, Kulla M, et al. . Standardisierte Erhebung von Vorstellungsgründen in Der Notaufnahme Implementierung von codierten Vorstellungsgründen in das elektronische Notaufnahmeinformationssystem eines Schwerpunktversorgers und deren Potenzial für die Versorgungsforschung. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2018;113:115–23. - PubMed
    1. Pines JM, Mullins PM, Cooper JK, et al. . National trends in emergency department use, care patterns, and quality of care of older adults in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013;61:12–17. 10.1111/jgs.12072 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schuur JD, Hsia RY, Burstin H, et al. . Quality measurement in the emergency department: past and future. Health Aff 2013;32:2129–38. 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0730 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stelfox HT, Straus SE, Nathens A, et al. . Evidence for quality indicators to evaluate adult trauma care: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2011;39:846–59. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820a859a - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources