Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Sep;9(3):e000871.
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000871.

Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation

Zoran Trogrlic et al. BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to explore: the exposure of healthcare workers to a delirium guidelines implementation programme; effects on guideline adherence at intensive care unit (ICU) level; impact on knowledge and barriers, and experiences with the implementation.

Design: A mixed-methods process evaluation of a prospective multicentre implementation study.

Setting: Six ICUs.

Participants: 4449 adult ICU patients and 500 ICU professionals approximately.

Intervention: A tailored implementation programme.

Main outcome measure: Adherence to delirium guidelines recommendations at ICU level before, during and after implementation; knowledge and perceived barriers; and experiences with the implementation.

Results: Five of six ICUs were exposed to all implementation strategies as planned. More than 85% followed the required e-learnings; 92% of the nurses attended the clinical classroom lessons; five ICUs used all available implementation strategies and perceived to have implemented all guideline recommendations (>90%). Adherence to predefined performance indicators (PIs) at ICU level was only above the preset target (>85%) for delirium screening. For all other PIs, the inter-ICU variability was between 34% and 72%. The implementation of delirium guidelines was feasible and successful in resolving the majority of barriers found before the implementation. The improvement was well sustained 6 months after full guideline implementation. Knowledge about delirium was improved (from 61% to 65%). The implementation programme was experienced as very successful.

Conclusions: Multifaceted implementation can improve and sustain adherence to delirium guidelines, is feasible and can largely be performed as planned. However, variability in delirium guideline adherence at individual ICUs remains a challenge, indicating the need for more tailoring at centre level.

Keywords: clinical practice guidelines; critical care; evaluation methodology; evidence-based practice; implementation science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adherence to process indicators over the study periods.

References

    1. Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Jackson JC, et al. . Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1306–16. 10.1056/NEJMoa1301372 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Milbrandt EB, Deppen S, Harrison PL, et al. . Costs associated with delirium in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 2004;32:955–62. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000119429.16055.92 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pisani MA, Kong SYJ, Kasl SV, et al. . Days of delirium are associated with 1-year mortality in an older intensive care unit population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;180:1092–7. 10.1164/rccm.200904-0537OC - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Girard TD, Jackson JC, Pandharipande PP, et al. . Delirium as a predictor of long-term cognitive impairment in survivors of critical illness. Crit Care Med 2010;38:1513–20. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e47be1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, et al. . Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373:1874–82. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60658-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types