Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Sep 18;11(5):e02243-20.
doi: 10.1128/mBio.02243-20.

Impaired Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cell Response in Elderly COVID-19 Patients

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Impaired Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cell Response in Elderly COVID-19 Patients

Jaana Westmeier et al. mBio. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection induces a T cell response that most likely contributes to virus control in COVID-19 patients but may also induce immunopathology. Until now, the cytotoxic T cell response has not been very well characterized in COVID-19 patients. Here, we analyzed the differentiation and cytotoxic profile of T cells in 30 cases of mild COVID-19 during acute infection. SARS-CoV-2 infection induced a cytotoxic response of CD8+ T cells, but not CD4+ T cells, characterized by the simultaneous production of granzyme A and B as well as perforin within different effector CD8+ T cell subsets. PD-1-expressing CD8+ T cells also produced cytotoxic molecules during acute infection, indicating that they were not functionally exhausted. However, in COVID-19 patients over the age of 80 years, the cytotoxic T cell potential was diminished, especially in effector memory and terminally differentiated effector CD8+ cells, showing that elderly patients have impaired cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Our data provide valuable information about T cell responses in COVID-19 patients that may also have important implications for vaccine development.IMPORTANCE Cytotoxic T cells are responsible for the elimination of infected cells and are key players in the control of viruses. CD8+ T cells with an effector phenotype express cytotoxic molecules and are able to perform target cell killing. COVID-19 patients with a mild disease course were analyzed for the differentiation status and cytotoxic profile of CD8+ T cells. SARS-CoV-2 infection induced a vigorous cytotoxic CD8+ T cell response. However, this cytotoxic profile of T cells was not detected in COVID-19 patients over the age of 80 years. Thus, the absence of a cytotoxic response in elderly patients might be a possible reason for the more frequent severity of COVID-19 in this age group than in younger patients.

Keywords: CD4+; CD8+; COVID-19; PD-1; SARS-CoV-2; aging; cytotoxic T cells; granzyme; perforin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
CD4+ T cells in COVID-19 patients. CD4+ T cells in blood of patients with mild COVID-19 and healthy donors were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Concentration of CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood of patients on the day of hospitalization and values for healthy donors of different ages. (B) The differentiation status of CD4+ T cells was determined by the expression of CD45RO, CCR7, and CD28. CD3+ CD4+ T cells were divided into naive (N; CD45RO CCR7+ CD28+), central memory (CM; CD45RO+ CCR7+ CD28+), transitional memory (TM; CD45RO+ CCR7 CD28+), effector memory (EM; CD45RO+ CCR7 CD28), and terminally differentiated effector (E; CD45RO CCR7 CD28) subpopulations. (C) The production of GzmA, GzmB, and perforin in CD3+ CD4+ T cells is shown in representative dot plots. (D to F) Percentages of CD4+ T cells producing GzmA (D), GzmB (E), and perforin (F). Each dot represents an individual patient. Statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; unpaired t test with Welch’s correction).
FIG 2
FIG 2
Reduced numbers of circulating CD8+ T cells in elderly COVID-19 patients. CD8+ T cells in the blood of patients with mild COVID-19 were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Concentration of CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood of patients on the day of hospitalization and values for healthy donors of different ages. (B) Correlation of age with concentration of CD8+ T cells in the blood of acute COVID-18 patients. Each dot represents an individual patient. (C) The differentiation status of CD8+ T cells was determined by the expression of CD45RO, CCR7, and CD28. CD3+ CD8+ T cells were divided into naive (N; CD45RO CCR7+ CD28+), central memory (CM; CD45RO+ CCR7+ CD28+), transitional memory (TM; CD45RO+ CCR7 CD28+), effector memory (EM; CD45RO+ CCR7 CD28), and terminally differentiated effector (E; CD45RO CCR7 CD28) subpopulations. Statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*, P < 0.05; unpaired t test with Welch’s correction, Pearson’s correlation coefficient).
FIG 3
FIG 3
Production of cytotoxic molecules by CD8+ T cells. Production of cytotoxic molecules by CD8+ T cells in blood from patients with mild COVID-19 and healthy donors was characterized by flow cytometry. (A) Representative dot plots show the production of GzmA, GzmB, and perforin in CD8+ T cells. (B to D) Percentages of CD8+ T cells producing GzmA (B), GzmB (C), and perforin (D). Each dot represents an individual patient. Statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001; nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test).
FIG 4
FIG 4
Production of cytotoxic molecules by PD-1+ CD8+ T cells. Expression of PD-1 and production of cytotoxic molecules in PD-1+ CD8+ T cells in the blood of patients with mild COVID-19 was characterized by flow cytometry. Percentages of CD8+ PD-1+ T cells (A) and of PD-1+CD8+ T cells producing GzmA (B), GzmB (C), and perforin (D) were calculated. Each dot represents an individual patient. (**, P < 0.01; nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test).
FIG 5
FIG 5
Production of cytotoxic molecules in different subpopulations of CD8+ T cells from COVID-19 patients. Differentiation of CD8+ T cells in the blood of patients with mild COVID-19 was analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative histograms of production of GzmA, GzmB, and perforin in CD8+ T cells at different stages of differentiation. The frequencies of transitional memory (TM; CD45RO+ CCR7 CD28+), effector memory (EM; CD45RO+ CCR7 CD28), and terminally differentiated effector (E; CD45RO CCR7 CD28) CD8+ T cells producing GzmA, GzmB, and perforin in the blood of patients with mild COVID-19 disease were detected by flow cytometry. (B to D) TM CD8+ T cells producing GzmA (B), GzmB (C), and perforin (D); (E to G) EM CD8+ T cells producing GzmA (E), GzmB (F), and perforin (G); (H to J) E CD8+ T cells producing GzmA (H), GzmB (I), and perforin (J). Each dot represents an individual patient. Statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*, P < 0.05; Dunn test with the Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple testing).
FIG 6
FIG 6
Simultaneous production of GzmA, GzmB, and perforin by CD8+ T cells from COVID-19 patients. Differentiation of CD8+ T cells in the blood of patients with mild COVID-19 was characterized by flow cytometry. The frequencies of CD8+ T cells simultaneously producing GzmA, GzmB, and perforin from patients in the 29- to 66-year-old, 70- to 79-year-old, and 80- to 96-year-old age groups were calculated for transitional memory (TM; CD45RO+ CCR7 CD28+) (A to C), effector memory (EM; CD45RO+ CCR7 CD28) (D to F), and terminally differentiated effector (E; CD45RO CCR7 CD28) (G to I) CD8+ T cells. Each dot represents an individual patient.

References

    1. Docherty AB, Harrison EM, Green CA, Hardwick HE, Pius R, Norman L, Holden KA, Read JM, Dondelinger F, Carson G, Merson L, Lee J, Plotkin D, Sigfrid L, Halpin S, Jackson C, Gamble C, Horby PW, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Ho A, Russell CD, Dunning J, Openshaw PJ, Baillie JK, Semple MG, ISARIC4C Investigators. 2020. Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 369:m1985. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1985. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, Liu L, Shan H, Lei CL, Hui DSC, Du B, Li LJ, Zeng G, Yuen KY, Chen RC, Tang CL, Wang T, Chen PY, Xiang J, Li SY, Wang JL, Liang ZJ, Peng YX, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu YH, Peng P, Wang JM, Liu JY, Chen Z, Li G, Zheng ZJ, Qiu SQ, Luo J, Ye CJ, Zhu SY, Zhong NS, China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. 2020. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 382:1708–1720. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu K, Chen Y, Lin R, Han K. 2020. Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: a comparison with young and middle-aged patients. J Infect 80:e14–e18. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verity R, Okell LC, Dorigatti I, Winskill P, Whittaker C, Imai N, Cuomo-Dannenburg G, Thompson H, Walker PGT, Fu H, Dighe A, Griffin JT, Baguelin M, Bhatia S, Boonyasiri A, Cori A, Cucunuba Z, FitzJohn R, Gaythorpe K, Green W, Hamlet A, Hinsley W, Laydon D, Nedjati-Gilani G, Riley S, van Elsland S, Volz E, Wang H, Wang Y, Xi X, Donnelly CA, Ghani AC, Ferguson NM. 2020. Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 20:669–677. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30243-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vabret N, Britton GJ, Gruber C, Hegde S, Kim J, Kuksin M, Levantovsky R, Malle L, Moreira A, Park MD, Pia L, Risson E, Saffern M, Salomé B, Esai Selvan M, Spindler MP, Tan J, van der Heide V, Gregory JK, Alexandropoulos K, Bhardwaj N, Brown BD, Greenbaum B, Gümüş ZH, Homann D, Horowitz A, Kamphorst AO, Curotto de Lafaille MA, Mehandru S, Merad M, Samstein RM, Sinai Immunology Review Project. 2020. Immunology of COVID-19: current state of the science. Immunity 52:910–941. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2020.05.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms