Application of machine learning to the prediction of postoperative sepsis after appendectomy
- PMID: 32951903
- PMCID: PMC7927311
- DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.07.045
Application of machine learning to the prediction of postoperative sepsis after appendectomy
Abstract
Background: We applied various machine learning algorithms to a large national dataset to model the risk of postoperative sepsis after appendectomy to evaluate utility of such methods and identify factors associated with postoperative sepsis in these patients.
Methods: The National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients undergoing appendectomy between 2005 and 2017. Logistic regression, support vector machines, random forest decision trees, and extreme gradient boosting machines were used to model the occurrence of postoperative sepsis.
Results: In the study, 223,214 appendectomies were identified; 2,143 (0.96%) were indicated as having postoperative sepsis. Logistic regression (area under the curve 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.73), random forest decision trees (area under the curve 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.73), and extreme gradient boosting (area under the curve 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.73) afforded similar performance, while support vector machines (area under the curve 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.52) had worse performance. Variable importance analyses identified preoperative congestive heart failure, transfusion, and acute renal failure as predictors of postoperative sepsis.
Conclusion: Machine learning methods can be used to predict the development of sepsis after appendectomy with moderate accuracy. Such predictive modeling has potential to ultimately allow for preoperative recognition of patients at risk for developing postoperative sepsis after appendectomy thus facilitating early intervention and reducing morbidity.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest/Disclosure
The authors have no related conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Application of Machine Learning Techniques to High-Dimensional Clinical Data to Forecast Postoperative Complications.PLoS One. 2016 May 27;11(5):e0155705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155705. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27232332 Free PMC article.
-
Machine Learning Algorithm Identifies Patients at High Risk for Early Complications After Intracranial Tumor Surgery: Registry-Based Cohort Study.Neurosurgery. 2019 Oct 1;85(4):E756-E764. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz145. Neurosurgery. 2019. PMID: 31149726
-
Prediction of the development of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery by machine learning.Crit Care. 2020 Jul 31;24(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03179-9. Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 32736589 Free PMC article.
-
A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Need for Hospitalization for Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation at the Time of Emergency Department Triage.Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(12):1463-1470. doi: 10.1111/acem.13655. Epub 2018 Nov 29. Acad Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 30382605
-
Combined application of inflammation-related biomarkers to predict postoperative complications of rectal cancer patients: a retrospective study by machine learning analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 13;408(1):400. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03127-5. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023. PMID: 37831218 Review.
Cited by
-
Machine Learning for the Prediction of Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients During or After Liver Transplantation Surgery.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 22;8:632210. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.632210. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 33693019 Free PMC article.
-
Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Outcomes after Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review.World J Surg. 2022 Dec;46(12):3100-3110. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06728-1. Epub 2022 Sep 15. World J Surg. 2022. PMID: 36109367 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial Intelligence and Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Models.World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec 19;18(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00527-2. World J Emerg Surg. 2023. PMID: 38114983 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Integration of Artificial Intelligence Models in Appendicitis Management: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;15(7):866. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070866. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40218216 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exploring the Immunological Role of the Microbial Composition of the Appendix and the Associated Risks of Appendectomies.J Pers Med. 2025 Mar 14;15(3):112. doi: 10.3390/jpm15030112. J Pers Med. 2025. PMID: 40137428 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Moore LJ, Moore FA, Todd SR, Jones SL, Turner KL, Bass BL. Sepsis in general surgery: The 2005–2007 national surgical quality improvement program perspective. Arch Surg. 2010;145:695–700. - PubMed
-
- Lagu T, Rothberg MB, Shieh M-S, Pekow PS, Steingrub JS, Lindenauer PK. Hospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:754–761. - PubMed
-
- Stewart B, Khanduri P, McCord C, et al. Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101:e9–e22. - PubMed
-
- Ninh A, Wood K, Bui AH, Leitman IM. Risk factors and outcomes for sepsis after appendectomy in adults. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019;20:601–606. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical