Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2020 Jun;15(2):185-190.
doi: 10.26574/maedica.2020.15.2.185.

Gender and Age Differences in Hip Fracture Types among Elderly: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Affiliations
Editorial

Gender and Age Differences in Hip Fracture Types among Elderly: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Kalliopi Alpantaki et al. Maedica (Bucur). 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the differences in distribution of intracapsular and extracapsular hip fractures among genders and age groups treated surgically. Materials and methods: This is a nine-year retrospective cohort study. The type of hip fractures, age, and sex-related as well as overall incidence among 2 430 patients aged over 65, surgically treated at the "Venizeleio" General Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece, were explored and evaluated. Outcomes: Women suffered hip fractures 2.9 times more often than men. The majority of patients hospitalized with hip fracture were above 75 years of age (62.3% in females and 59.3% in males). The proportion of extracapsular and intracapsular fractures were 59.6% and 40.4% in men and 62.7% and 37.2% in women, respectively. Extracapsular-intertrochanteric fractures were found to increase dramatically with age in women (from 52.3% in patients younger than 75 to 58.8% in those older than 75; p-value=0.007), while in men they slightly increased with age (57.7% in patients older than 75, compared to 55.7% in those less than 75; p-value=0.62). Conclusion: The pattern of hip fractures was found to differ between genders and age groups in the present patients' population. Most likely, these findings reflect differences in the nature and rate of bone loss, and frequency of falling events between males and females. It has become evident that the two main hip fracture types (extracapsular and intracapsular) are distinct clinical entities. Hence, they should be addressed independently in terms of underlying causes and prevention strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Per year-hip fracture analysis

References

    1. Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:s3–s7. - PubMed
    1. Chang KP, Center JR, Nguyen TV, et al. Incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women: Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. Journal of Bone & Mineral Research. 2004;19:532–536. - PubMed
    1. Koutserimpas C, Samonis G, Vrentzos E, et al. In-hospital falls in older patients: A prospective study at the University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece. Australas J Ageing. 2016;35:64. - PubMed
    1. Mautalen CA, Vega EM, Einhorn TA. Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different? Bone. 1996;18:133. - PubMed
    1. Tanner DA, Kloseck M, Crilly RG, et al. Hip fracture types in men and women change differently with age. BMC Geriatr. 2010;10:12. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources