Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2020 Jun;15(2):206-223.
doi: 10.26574/maedica.2020.15.2.206.

The Effect of Mechanical and Chemical Surface Preparation Methods on the Bond Strength in Repairing the Surface of Metal-Ceramic Crowns with Composite Resin: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Farzaneh Shirani  1 , Azadeh Kianipour  2 , Mahdi Rahbar  3
Affiliations
Editorial

The Effect of Mechanical and Chemical Surface Preparation Methods on the Bond Strength in Repairing the Surface of Metal-Ceramic Crowns with Composite Resin: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Farzaneh Shirani et al. Maedica (Bucur). 2020 Jun.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to find the most effective surface preparation methods to enhance the bond strength between the composite resin and surface remaining from ceramic fracture. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 39 studies were examined. The information related to the studies was extracted and categorized based on the type of the substrate material and applying or not applying thermal cycles (p<0.05). In the meta-analysis of substrate metal-ceramic samples without aging, application of air abrasion resulted in a significant increase of the bond strength to composite resin when using chemical compounds of the group without the mentioned functional monomers. Application of mechanical and chemical surface preparation methods can result in enhanced bond strength of the composite to the substrate material, which depends on the type of substrate material.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

TABLE 1.
TABLE 1.
Selected keywords based on PICO pattern
TABLE 2.
TABLE 2.
Search strategy used in PubMed (MEDLINE) and EBSCO
TABLE 3.
TABLE 3.
Demographic data of included studies in non-aged base metal group
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. A. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + phosphate monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P) versus air abrasion + R- monomers (ME-SB+CHE-R).
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. B. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + phosphate monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P) versus air abrasion + 4-MET monomers (ME-SB+CHE-MET).
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. C. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + phosphate monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P) versus air abrasion+ phosphate and sulfur monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P+ CHE-Q).
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. D. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + phosphate monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P) versus air abrasion + phosphate and 4-MET monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P+CHE-MET).
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. E. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + R - monomers (ME-SB+CHE-R) versus air abrasion + 4- MET monomers (ME-SB+CHE-MET).
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. F. Surface treatment by using air abrasion+ R- monomers (ME-SB+CHE-R) versus using R- monomers (ME-no treatment + CHE-R).
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. G. Surface treatment by using air abrasion+ R- monomers (ME-SB+CHE-R) versus air abrasion + phosphate and sulfur- monomers (ME-SB+ CHE-P+ CHE-Q).
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. H. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + R - monomers (ME-SB+CHE-R) versus air abrasion + phosphate and 4-MET monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P+CHE-MET).
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. I. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + 4-MET monomers (ME-SB+CHE-MET) versus air abrasion + phosphate and sulfur monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P+CHE-Q)
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. J. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + 4-MET monomers (ME-SB+CHE-MET) versus air abrasion + phosphate and 4-MET monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P+CHE-MET).
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. K. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + phosphate and 4-MET monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P+CHE-MET) versus air abrasion+ phosphate and sulfur monomers (ME-SB+ CHE-P+CHE-Q).
TABLE 4.
TABLE 4.
Demographic data of included studies in aged base metal group
TABLE 4.
TABLE 4.
Demographic data of included studies in aged base metal group
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys with aging. A. Surface treatment by using air abrasion+ phosphate monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P) versus air abrasion + 4-MET monomers (ME-SB+ CHE-MET).
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. B. Surface treatment by using air abrasion+ phosphate monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P) versus air abrasion + R - monomers (ME-SB+CHE-R).
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. C. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + phosphate monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P) versus air abrasion+ Phosphate and 4-MET monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P+CHE-MET).
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. D. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + 4-MET monomers (ME-SB+CHE-MET) versus air abrasion + R- monomers (ME-SB+CHE-R).
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. E. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + R - monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P) versus air abrasion + phosphate and sulfur monomers (ME-SB+CHE-P+CHE-Q).
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to base metal alloys without aging. F. Surface treatment by using air abrasion + silane application (ME-SB+CHE-Si) versus using cojet technique and silane application (ME-SB+CHE-C+CHE-Si).
TABLE 5.
TABLE 5.
Demographic data of included studies in aged porcelain + base metal group
TABLE 6.
TABLE 6.
Demographic data of included studies in non-aged porcelain + base metal group
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Results for the analysis of the mean bond strength of composite resins to porcelain fused to base metal alloys without aging when surfaces were treated by using air abrasion + R-monomers versus using R-monomers
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Furuchi M, Oshima A, Ishikawa Y, et al. Effect of metal priming agents on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomers joined to gold alloy. Dent Mater J. 2007;5:728–732. - PubMed
    1. Anusavice K, Kakar K, Ferree N. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic‐based dental prostheses? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;3:218–231. - PubMed
    1. dos Santos JG, Fonseca RG, Adabo GL, dos Santos Cruz CA. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;3:165–173. - PubMed
    1. Galiatsatos AA. An indirect repair technique for fractured metal-ceramic restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;4:321–323. - PubMed
    1. Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;5:526–531. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources