Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 3:16:2151-2192.
doi: 10.3762/bjoc.16.183. eCollection 2020.

Photosensitized direct C-H fluorination and trifluoromethylation in organic synthesis

Affiliations
Review

Photosensitized direct C-H fluorination and trifluoromethylation in organic synthesis

Shahboz Yakubov et al. Beilstein J Org Chem. .

Abstract

The importance of fluorinated products in pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry has necessitated the development of synthetic fluorination methods, of which direct C-H fluorination is among the most powerful. Despite the challenges and limitations associated with the direct fluorination of unactivated C-H bonds, appreciable advancements in manipulating the selectivity and reactivity have been made, especially via transition metal catalysis and photochemistry. Where transition metal catalysis provides one strategy for C-H bond activation, transition-metal-free photochemical C-H fluorination can provide a complementary selectivity via a radical mechanism that proceeds under milder conditions than thermal radical activation methods. One exciting development in C-F bond formation is the use of small-molecule photosensitizers, allowing the reactions i) to proceed under mild conditions, ii) to be user-friendly, iii) to be cost-effective and iv) to be more amenable to scalability than typical photoredox-catalyzed methods. In this review, we highlight photosensitized C-H fluorination as a recent strategy for the direct and remote activation of C-H (especially C(sp3)-H) bonds. To guide the readers, we present the developing mechanistic understandings of these reactions and exemplify concepts to assist the future planning of reactions.

Keywords: C–H activation; energy transfer; fluorination; photocatalysis; photosensitization; visible light.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fluorine-containing drugs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fluorinated agrochemicals.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Selectivity of fluorination reactions.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Different mechanisms of photocatalytic activation. Sub = substrate.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Jablonski diagram showing visible-light-induced energy transfer pathways: a) absorption, b) IC, c) fluorescence, d) radiationless transitions, e) ISC, f) phosphorescence and g) TTET.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic illustration of TTET.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Organic triplet PSCats.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Additional organic triplet PSCats.
Figure 7
Figure 7
A) Further organic triplet PSCats and B) transition metal triplet PSCats.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Different fluorination reagents grouped by generation.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Synthesis of Selectfluor®.
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
General mechanism of PS TTET C(sp3)–H fluorination.
Scheme 5
Scheme 5
Selective benzylic mono- and difluorination using 9-fluorenone and xanthone PSCats, respectively.
Scheme 6
Scheme 6
Chen’s photosensitized monofluorination: reaction scope.
Scheme 7
Scheme 7
Chen’s photosensitized benzylic difluorination reaction scope.
Scheme 8
Scheme 8
Photosensitized monofluorination of ethylbenzene on a gram scale.
Scheme 9
Scheme 9
Substrate scope of Tan’s AQN-photosensitized C(sp3)–H fluorination.
Scheme 10
Scheme 10
AQN-photosensitized C–H fluorination reaction on a gram scale.
Scheme 11
Scheme 11
Reaction mechanism of the AQN-assisted fluorination.
Figure 9
Figure 9
3D structures of the singlet ground and triplet excited states of Selectfluor®.
Scheme 12
Scheme 12
Associated transitions for the activation of acetophenone by violet light.
Scheme 13
Scheme 13
Ethylbenzene C–H fluorination with various PSCats and conditions.
Scheme 14
Scheme 14
Effect of different PSCats on the C(sp3)–H fluorination of cyclohexane (39).
Scheme 15
Scheme 15
Reaction scope of Chen’s acetophenone-photosensitized C(sp3)–H fluorination reaction.
Figure 10
Figure 10
a) Site-selectivity of Chen’s acetophenone-photosensitized C–H fluorination reaction [201]. b) Site-selectivity of Tan’s AQN-photosensitized C–H fluorination reaction [198].
Scheme 16
Scheme 16
Formation of the AQN–Selectfluor® exciplex Int1.
Scheme 17
Scheme 17
Generation of the C3 2° pentane radical and the Selectfluor® N-radical cation from the exciplex.
Scheme 18
Scheme 18
Hydrogen atom abstraction by the Selectfluor® N-radical cation from pentane to give the C3 2° pentane radical.
Scheme 19
Scheme 19
Fluorine atom transfer from Selectfluor® to the C3 2° pentane radical to yield 3-fluoropentane and the Selectfluor® N-radical cation.
Scheme 20
Scheme 20
Barrierless fluorine atom transfer from Int1 to the C3 2° pentane radical to yield 3-fluoropentane, AQN and the Selectfluor® N-radical cation.
Scheme 21
Scheme 21
Ketone-directed C(sp3)–H fluorination.
Scheme 22
Scheme 22
Ketone-directed fluorination through a 5- and a 6-membered transition state, respectively.
Scheme 23
Scheme 23
Effect of different PSCats on the photosensitized C(sp3)–H fluorination of 47.
Scheme 24
Scheme 24
Substrate scope of benzil-photoassisted C(sp3)–H fluorinations.
Scheme 25
Scheme 25
A) Benzil-photoassisted enone-directed C(sp3)–H fluorination. B) Classification of the reaction modes and transition states to rationalize the site-selectivity. C) C–H fluorination site-selectivity.
Scheme 26
Scheme 26
A) Xanthone-photoassisted ketal-directed C(sp3)–H fluorination. B) Substrate scope. C) C–H fluorination site-selectivity.
Scheme 27
Scheme 27
Rationale for the selective HAT at the C2 C–H bond of galactose acetonide.
Scheme 28
Scheme 28
Photosensitized C(sp3)–H benzylic fluorination of a peptide using different PSCats.
Scheme 29
Scheme 29
Peptide scope of 5-benzosuberenone-photoassisted C(sp3)–H fluorinations.
Scheme 30
Scheme 30
Continuous flow PS TTET monofluorination of 72.
Scheme 31
Scheme 31
Photosensitized C–H fluorination of N-butylphthalimide as a PSX.
Scheme 32
Scheme 32
Substrate scope and limitations of the PSX C(sp3)–H monofluorination.
Scheme 33
Scheme 33
Substrate crossover monofluorination experiment.
Scheme 34
Scheme 34
PS TTET mechanism proposed by Hamashima and co-workers.
Scheme 35
Scheme 35
Photosensitized TFM of 78 to afford α-trifluoromethylated ketone 80.
Scheme 36
Scheme 36
Substrate scope for photosensitized styrene TFM to give α-trifluoromethylated ketones.
Scheme 37
Scheme 37
Control reactions for photosensitized TFM of styrenes.
Scheme 38
Scheme 38
Reaction mechanism for photosensitized TFM of styrenes to afford α-trifluoromethylated ketones.
Scheme 39
Scheme 39
Reaction conditions for TFMs to yield the cis- and the trans-product, respectively.
Scheme 40
Scheme 40
Substrate scope of trifluoromethylated (E)-styrenes.
Scheme 41
Scheme 41
Strategies toward trifluoromethylated (Z)-styrenes.
Scheme 42
Scheme 42
Substrate scope of trifluoromethylated (Z)-styrenes.
Scheme 43
Scheme 43
Reaction mechanism for photosensitized TFM of styrenes to afford E- or Z-products.

References

    1. Liang T, Neumann C N, Ritter T. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:8214–8264. doi: 10.1002/anie.201206566. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee E, Kamlet A S, Powers D C, Neumann C N, Boursalian G B, Furuya T, Choi D C, Hooker J M, Ritter T. Science. 2011;334:639–642. doi: 10.1126/science.1212625. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell M G, Ritter T. Chem Rev. 2015;115:612–633. doi: 10.1021/cr500366b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hollingworth C, Gouverneur V. Chem Commun. 2012;48:2929–2942. doi: 10.1039/c2cc16158c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Purser S, Moore P R, Swallow S, Gouverneur V. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:320–330. doi: 10.1039/b610213c. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources