Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 20;10(17):9567-9580.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.6701. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Effect of wind farms on wintering ducks at an important wintering ground in China along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway

Affiliations

Effect of wind farms on wintering ducks at an important wintering ground in China along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway

Shanshan Zhao et al. Ecol Evol. .

Abstract

Wind farms offer a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels and can mitigate their negative effects on climate change. However, wind farms may have negative impacts on birds. The East China Coast forms a key part of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway, and it is a crucial region for wind energy development in China. However, despite ducks being the dominant animal taxon along the East China Coast in winter and considered as particularly vulnerable to the effects of wind farms, the potential negative impacts of wind farms on duck populations remain unclear. We therefore assessed the effects of wind farms on duck abundance, distribution, and habitat use at Chongming Dongtan, which is a major wintering site for ducks along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway, using field surveys and satellite tracking. We conducted seven paired field surveys of ducks inside wind farm (IWF) and outside wind farm (OWF) sites in artificial brackish marsh, paddy fields, and aquaculture ponds. Duck abundance was significantly higher in OWF compared with IWF sites and significantly higher in artificial brackish marsh than in aquaculture ponds and paddy fields. Based on 1,918 high-resolution satellite tracking records, the main habitat types of ducks during the day and at night were artificial brackish marsh and paddy fields, respectively. Furthermore, grid-based analysis showed overlaps between ducks and wind farms, with greater overlap at night than during the day. According to resource selection functions, habitat use by wintering ducks was impacted by distance to water, land cover, human activity, and wind farm effects, and the variables predicted to have significant impacts on duck habitat use differed between day and night. Our study suggests that wintering ducks tend to avoid wind turbines at Chongming Dongtan, and landscape of paddy fields and artificial wetlands adjoining natural wetlands is crucial for wintering ducks.

Keywords: Anatidae; East Asian–Australasian Flyway; coastal wetlands; landscape; wind energy development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Landscape classification, wind turbine distributions (a), and duck survey quadrats at sites inside wind farms (IWF) (b) and outside wind farms (OWF) (c) at Chongming Dongtan, China
Figure 2
Figure 2
Duck densities at sites inside wind farms (IWF) and outside wind farms (OWF) overall and in each habitat (a) and among three habitats (b) at Chongming Dongtan in the Yangtze River mouth, China. Results shown as mean ± standard error of duck density (ind/ha). Horizontal lines indicate significant differences in duck density between artificial brackish marsh and paddy fields. ***p < .001; **p < .01; *p < .05
Figure 3
Figure 3
Observed overlaps between duck locations and wind turbines during the day (a) and at night (b), and expected overlaps between duck crossings and wind turbines during the day (c) and at night (d) Chongming Dongtan, China, from December 2018 to March 2019. Unit of analysis was 0.25 km2 (0.5 × 0.5 km) grid cells
Figure 4
Figure 4
Wintering duck composite kernel‐based 50% core‐use (brown) areas and 95% utilization distributions (green) during the day (top) and at night (bottom) at Chongming Dongtan, China, from December 2018 to March 2019

References

    1. Anderson, D. R. , Link, W. A. , Johnson, D. H. , & Burnham, K. P. (2001). Suggestions for presenting the results of data analyses. Journal of Wildlife Management, 65(3), 373 10.2307/3803088 - DOI
    1. Aschwanden, J. , Stark, H. , Peter, D. , Steuri, T. , Schmid, B. , & Liechti, F. (2018). Bird collisions at wind turbines in a mountainous area related to bird movement intensities measured by radar. Biological Conservation, 220, 228–236. 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.005 - DOI
    1. Bai, Q. , Chen, J. , Chen, Z. , Dong, G. , Dong, J. , Dong, W. , … Zeng, X. (2015). Identification of coastal wetlands of international importance for waterbirds: A review of China Coastal Waterbird Surveys 2005–2013. Avian Research, 6(1), 1–16. 10.1186/s40657-015-0021-2 - DOI
    1. Bamford, M. , Watkins, D. , Bancroft, W. , Tischler, G. , & Wahl, J. (2008). Migratory shorebirds of the East Asian‐Australasian Flyway: Population estimates and internationally important sites. Canberra, ACT: Wetlands International ‐ Oceania.
    1. Barron, D. G. , Brawn, J. D. , & Weatherhead, P. J. (2010). Meta‐analysis of transmitter effects on avian behaviour and ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(2), 180–187. 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00013.x - DOI

LinkOut - more resources