Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1987 Jun 19;257(23):3233-40.

Beneficial effects of combined colestipol-niacin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis and coronary venous bypass grafts

  • PMID: 3295315
Clinical Trial

Beneficial effects of combined colestipol-niacin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis and coronary venous bypass grafts

D H Blankenhorn et al. JAMA. .

Erratum in

  • JAMA 1988 May 13;259(18):2698

Abstract

The Cholesterol-Lowering Atherosclerosis Study (CLAS) was a randomized, placebo-controlled, angiographic trial testing combined colestipol hydrochloride and niacin therapy in 162 nonsmoking men aged 40 to 59 years with previous coronary bypass surgery. During two years of treatment there was a 26% reduction in total plasma cholesterol, a 43% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, plus a simultaneous 37% elevation of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. This resulted in a significant reduction in the average number of lesions per subject that progressed (P less than .03) and the percentage of subjects with new atheroma formation (P less than .03) in native coronary arteries. Also, the percentage of subjects with new lesions (P less than .04) or any adverse change in bypass grafts (P less than .03) was significantly reduced. Deterioration in overall coronary status was significantly less in drug-treated subjects than placebo-treated subjects (P less than .001). Atherosclerosis regression, as indicated by perceptible improvement in overall coronary status, occurred in 16.2% of colestipol-niacin treated vs 2.4% placebo treated (P = .002).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms