Study of CO2 Enhancing Shale Gas Recovery Based on Competitive Adsorption Theory
- PMID: 32954196
- PMCID: PMC7496004
- DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03383
Study of CO2 Enhancing Shale Gas Recovery Based on Competitive Adsorption Theory
Abstract
As an indispensable part of unconventional natural gas resources, the shale reservoir is huge and widely distributed. It is of great significance to study how to enhance the shale gas recovery for improving the energy structure. In order to solve the problem of low gas production rate and long recovery period in the process of shale gas production, in this paper, the influences of pressure, temperature, moisture, and gas type on isothermal adsorption and desorption of shale gas are analyzed based on shale adsorption and desorption experiments, and the adsorption and desorption abilities of CO2 and CH4 in shale are compared to verify the feasibility of CO2 enhancing shale gas recovery. Depletion production experiments and CO2 injection experiments with different injection pressures (6 and 7 MPa), different injection rates (5, 10 and 20 mL/min), and different injection amounts are carried out. The mechanism of CO2 enhancing shale gas recovery is proposed, and the parameters of CO2 injection are optimized. The results show that the adsorption capacity of CH4 increases with the increase in pressure and the decrease in temperature and moisture in a certain range. Under the same experimental conditions, the sorting of adsorption capacity is CO2 > CH4 > N2, while desorption capacity is CH4 > CO2 > N2. The desorption curves of the three gases lag behind the adsorption curves, in which the lag phenomenon of CO2 is most obvious. The ultimate recovery of depletion production ranges from 66 to 73%. CO2 injection can effectively increase the gas production rate of CH4, and it can also keep the cumulative gas production of CH4 growing steadily and rapidly. Within a certain range, CH4 recovery increases with the increase in CO2 injection pressure, the injection rate, and injection amount, but its increase range is related to the porosity and permeability of shale.
Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Figures









References
-
- Dong Z.; Holditch S.; McVay D.; Ayers W. B. Global Unconventional Gas Resource Assessment. SPE Econ. Manag. 2012, 4, 222–234. 10.2118/148365-PA. - DOI
-
- Qian B.; Zhang J.; Zhu J.; Fang Z.; Kou S.; Chen R. Application of Zipper-Fracturing of Horizontal Cluster Wells in the Changning Shale Gas Pilot Zone, Sichuan Basin. Nat. Gas Ind. 2015, 2, 181–184. 10.1016/j.ngib.2015.07.008. - DOI
-
- Yuan J.; Luo D.; Feng L. A Review of the Technical and Economic Evaluation Techniques for Shale Gas Development. Appl. Energy 2015, 148, 49–65. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.040. - DOI
-
- Jenkins C. D.; Boyer C. M. Coalbed- and Shale-Gas Reservoirs. J. Pet. Technol. 2008, 60, 92–99. 10.2118/103514-JPT. - DOI
-
- Rivard C.; Lavoie D.; Lefebvre R.; Séjourné S.; Lamontagne C.; Duchesne M. An Overview of Canadian Shale Gas Production and Environmental Concerns. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2014, 126, 64–76. 10.1016/j.coal.2013.12.004. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials