Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Nov;18(6):486-495.
doi: 10.2450/2020.0091-20. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

Anticoagulation in Italian patients with venous thromboembolism and thrombophilic alterations: findings from START2 register study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Anticoagulation in Italian patients with venous thromboembolism and thrombophilic alterations: findings from START2 register study

Maurizio Margaglione et al. Blood Transfus. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Randomised control trials have assessed the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Positive but limited results have been reported in patients with inherited thrombophilia. Using an Italian, multicentre, prospective registry of consecutive patients presenting with symptomatic, acute VTE, we aimed to assess which factors are involved in making the choice of the drug that best fits the patient's risk profile in a large real-world setting of VTE patients.

Materials and methods: We investigated 4,866 VTE patients who took oral anticoagulants in the period between 2012 and April 2018 to prevent a new thromboembolic episode.

Results: The large majority of patients who underwent thrombophilic screening, regardless of the results obtained, were prescribed direct oral anticoagulants rather than conventional anticoagulant therapy (p<0.001). During anticoagulation, bleeding events occurred more frequently in patients on conventional anticoagulant therapy (4.2%) than in those receiving direct oral anticoagulants (1.8%) and an increase in bleeding events was observed in patients who tested positive at the thrombophilic screening. Overall, a higher number of recurrent VTE was observed in patients not screened for thrombophilia (n=36; 1.7%) than in those screened (n=20; 0.7%; adjusted odds ratio: 2.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.2-4.1).

Discussion: The present data confirm previous findings from other post-marketing registries and suggest that the choice of oral anticoagulation is strongly driven by patients' characteristics and VTE manifestations. Factors leading to the prescription of thrombophilic screening may identify a patient with a lower risk of VTE recurrence during anticoagulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prescription pattern of the anticoagulant regimen prescribed according to year of enrolment in the register no: not screened; −ve: negative at the screening; +ve: positive at the screening.

References

    1. White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107(Suppl 1):4–8. - PubMed
    1. Ageno W, Gallus AS, Wittkowsky A, et al. Oral anticoagulant therapy: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e44S–e88S. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2342–52. - PubMed
    1. Bauersachs R, Berkowitz SD, Brenner B, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2499–510. - PubMed
    1. Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A, et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:799–808. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms