Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 21;22(9):e19195.
doi: 10.2196/19195.

How People with Parkinson's Disease and Health Care Professionals Wish to Partner in Care Using eHealth: Co-Design Study

Affiliations

How People with Parkinson's Disease and Health Care Professionals Wish to Partner in Care Using eHealth: Co-Design Study

Carolina Wannheden et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, the number of people with Parkinson's disease (PD) is predicted to double between the years 2005 and 2030. Chronic care management requires active collaboration and knowledge exchange between patients and health care professionals (HCPs) for best possible health outcomes, which we describe as co-care. eHealth services have the potential to support the realization of co-care between people with PD (PwP) and HCPs.

Objective: This study aimed to explore how co-care could be operationalized in PD care, supported by eHealth. More specifically, this study explores PwP's and HCPs' expectations and desired eHealth functionalities to achieve co-care.

Methods: Principles of participatory design were used to enable the identification of co-care needs and design ideas, in a series of 4 half-day co-design workshops. The sample included 7 (4 women) PwP and 9 (4 women) HCPs, including 4 neurologists, 3 nurses, and 2 physiotherapists. The co-design process resulted in a functional prototype that was evaluated by the co-design participants in the last workshop. Data were collected through note cards produced by the participants during the first 3 workshops and focus group discussions during the 3rd and 4th workshops. The data were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. After the workshop series, the prototype was demonstrated at a Mini Fair for ongoing PD research and evaluated using a self-developed questionnaire with 37 respondents: 31 PwP (14 women) and 6 informal caregivers (3 women). Descriptive statistics are reported.

Results: The qualitative analysis of data resulted in 2 main themes. The first theme, core eHealth functionalities and their expected values, describes 6 desired eHealth functionalities for supporting PD co-care between PwP and HCPs: (1) self-tracking, (2) previsit forms, (3) graphical visualization, (4) clinical decision support, (5) self-care recommendations, and (6) asynchronous communication. The second theme, individual and organizational constraints, describes constraints that need to be addressed to succeed with an eHealth service for co-care. Individual constraints include eHealth literacy and acceptance; organizational constraints include teamwork and administrative workload. The majority of the questionnaire respondents (31/37, 84%) perceived that they would benefit from an eHealth service similar to the demonstrated prototype. All prototype functionalities were rated as very important or important by the majority of respondents (ranging from 86% to 97% per functionality).

Conclusions: This study adds to our knowledge on how PD co-care could be operationalized. Co-care implies a shift from episodic routine-driven care to more flexible care management that is driven by the mutual needs of patients and HCPs and supported by active information exchange between them, as well as automated information processing to generate patient-specific advice. More research is needed to further explore the concept of co-care in chronic care management and what it means for self-care and health care.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/11278.

Keywords: Parkinson's disease; chronic care; clinical decision support; co-creation; co-design; eHealth; mHealth; participatory design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the co-design workshops performed to explore how people with Parkinson's disease (PD) and health care professionals would like to partner in chronic care management, with particular emphasis on how eHealth could support them. WS: workshop.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Use case diagram describing the desired functionalities of an eHealth service to support co-care in Parkinson’s disease care management, targeting the patient (left) and health care professionals (HCPs; right). The numbers in circles refer to the numbered eHealth functionalities in the text.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Commission Health and Consumers Directorate-General . The 2014 EU Summit on Chronic Diseases Brussels. Luxembourg: European Commission; 2014. Apr 3, [2020-08-30]. Conference Conclusions. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/major_chronic_diseases/do....
    1. Lees AJ, Hardy J, Revesz T. Parkinson's disease. The Lancet. 2009 Jun 13;373(9680):2055–2066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60492-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dorsey ER, Constantinescu R, Thompson JP, Biglan KM, Holloway RG, Kieburtz K, Marshall FJ, Ravina BM, Schifitto G, Siderowf A, Tanner CM. Projected number of people with Parkinson disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030. Neurology. 2007 Jan 30;68(5):384–6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000247740.47667.03. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holman H, Lorig K. Patient self-management: a key to effectiveness and efficiency in care of chronic disease. Public Health Rep. 2004;119(3):239–43. doi: 10.1016/j.phr.2004.04.002. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/15158102 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002 Oct 09;288(14):1775–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1775. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types