Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation: uncertain at best
- PMID: 32956260
- DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001971
Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation: uncertain at best
Comment in
-
Reply to Sharma et al.Pain. 2020 Oct;161(10):2429-2430. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001972. Pain. 2020. PMID: 32956261 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo/sham controlled randomised trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain.Pain. 2020 Jan;161(1):24-35. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001689. Pain. 2020. PMID: 31453983
References
-
- Australian Department of Health-Therapeutic Goods Administration. A document relating to the registration and adverse events for spinal cord stimulators. Available at: https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-1097-1819-01.pdf. Accessed 2 June, 2020.
-
- Duarte RV, McNicol E, Colloca L, Taylor RS, North RB, Eldabe S. Randomized placebo-/sham-controlled trials of spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review and methodological appraisal. Neuromodulation 2020;23:10–8.
-
- Duarte RV, Nevitt S, McNicol E, Taylor RS, Buchser E, North RB, Eldabe S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo/sham controlled randomised trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain. PAIN 2020;161:24–35.
-
- Medtronic. Therapy overview. Available at: https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/patients/treatments-therapies/spinal-cor.... Accessed 2 June, 2020.
-
- Mueller PS, Montori VM, Bassler D, Koenig BA, Guyatt GH. Ethical issues in stopping randomized trials early because of apparent benefit. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:878–81.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources