Reply to Sharma et al
- PMID: 32956261
- DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001972
Reply to Sharma et al
Comment on
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo/sham controlled randomised trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain.Pain. 2020 Jan;161(1):24-35. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001689. Pain. 2020. PMID: 31453983
-
Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation: uncertain at best.Pain. 2020 Oct;161(10):2428-2429. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001971. Pain. 2020. PMID: 32956260 No abstract available.
References
-
- Al-Kaisy A, Royds J, Palmisani S, Pang D, Wesley S, Taylor RS, Cook A, Eldabe S, McCracken L, Duarte R, Fairbank J. Multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial of 10 khz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic low back pain (MODULATE-LBP): a trial protocol. Trials 2020;21:111.
-
- de Vos CC, Meier K, Zaalberg PB, Nijhuis HJ, Duyvendak W, Vesper J, Enggaard TP, Lenders MW. Spinal cord stimulation in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy: a multicentre randomized clinical trial. PAIN 2014;155:2426–31.
-
- Duarte RV, Nevitt S, McNicol E, Taylor RS, Buchser E, North RB, Eldabe S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo/sham controlled randomised trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain. PAIN 2020;161:24–35.
-
- Duarte RV, McNicol E, Colloca L, Taylor RS, North RB, Eldabe S. Randomized placebo-/sham-controlled trials of spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review and methodological appraisal. Neuromodulation 2020;23:10–18.
-
- Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JP, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vail A. Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:140–9.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources