Incidence of acute pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 32958372
- PMCID: PMC7498252
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.09.006
Incidence of acute pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has been described as a frequent and prognostically relevant complication of COVID-19 infection.
Aim: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the in-hospital incidence of acute PE among COVID-19 patients based on studies published within four months of COVID-19 outbreak.
Material and methods: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed in abstracting data and assessing validity. We searched Medline, Scopus and Web of Science to locate all articles published up to August 1, 2020 reporting the incidence of acute PE (or lung thrombosis) in COVID-19 patients. The pooled in-hospital incidence of acute PE among COVID-19 patients was calculated using a random effects model and presenting the related 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was measured using the Higgins I2 statistic.
Results: We analysed data from 7178 COVID-19 patients [mean age 60.4 years] included in twenty-three studies. Among patients hospitalized in general wards and intensive care unit (ICU), the pooled in-hospital incidence of PE (or lung thrombosis) was 14.7% of cases (95% CI: 9.9-21.3%, I2=95.0%, p<0.0001) and 23.4% (95% CI:16.7-31.8%, I2=88.7%, p<0.0001), respectively. Segmental/sub-segmental pulmonary arteries were more frequently involved compared to main/lobar arteries (6.8% vs18.8%, p<0.001). Computer tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) was used only in 35.3% of patients with COVID-19 infection across six studies.
Conclusions: The in-hospital incidence of acute PE among COVID-19 patients is higher in ICU patients compared to those hospitalized in general wards. CTPA was rarely used suggesting a potential underestimation of PE cases.
Keywords: Covid-19; Epidemiology; Meta-analysis; Pulmonary embolism.
Copyright © 2020 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
S.B. reports personal fees from Biocompatibles Group UK and Bayer HealthCare, non-financial support from Bayer HealthCare and Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work.
S.V.K. reports grants and non-financial support from Bayer AG; grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Bayer AG, grants and personal fees from Actelion, grants and personal fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, grants and personal fees from Biocompatibles Group UK, personal fees from Pfizer—Bristol-Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from MSD, outside the submitted work
The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Figures
References
-
- Lodigiani C., Iapichino G., Carenzo L., Cecconi M., Ferrazzi P., Sebastian T., Kucher N., Studt J.D., Sacco C., Alexia B., Sandri M.T., Barco S., Humanitas COVID-19 Task Force Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic hospital in Milan, Italy. Thromb Res. 2020;191:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Helms J., Tacquard C., Severac F., Leonard-Lorant I., Ohana M., Delabranche X., Merdji H., Clere-Jehl R., Schenck M., Fagot Gandet F., Fafi-Kremer S., Castelain V., Schneider F., Grunebaum L., Anglés-Cano E., Sattler L., Mertes P.M., Meziani F., CRICS TRIGGERSEP Group (Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Trial Group for Global Evaluation and Research in Sepsis) High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06062-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
