The use of comprehensive complication Index® in pancreatic surgery: a comparison with the Clavien-Dindo system in a high volume center

Abstract

Background: The Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) system and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) are both widely used methods for reporting the burden of postoperative complications. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the CDC and CCI® in predicting outcomes associated with pancreatic surgery.

Methods: The CCI® and CDC were applied to 668 patients who underwent pancreatic resection. Length of postoperative stay (LOS) was chosen as the primary outcome variable. The comparison between CCI® and CDC was made with the Spearman test, reporting þs with standard error (SE) and logistic regression, reporting the Odds Ratio (OR) and Area Under the Curve with SE.

Results: The median value with the interquartile range (IQR) of CCI® was 20.9 (0-29.6). Both CCI® (þs = 0.609) and CDC (0.590) were significantly (P < 0.001) correlated to LOS. CCI (OR 1.056 and OR 1.052) and CDC (OR 1.978, and OR 1.994) predicted (P < 0.001) LOS over the median and 75th percentile. The accuracy of CCI® was superior to CDC for LOS over 50th (0.785 vs. 0.740; P = 0.004) and over 75th (0.835 vs. 0.761; P < 0.001) percentile.

Conclusion: The accuracy of CCI® in measuring the complicated postoperative course was superior to CDC, correctly classifying eight patients every ten tested.