Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 21;47(12):e44.
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106412. Online ahead of print.

A stakeholder meeting exploring the ethical perspectives of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery

Matthew Quinn  1 , Daniel Gray  2 , Ahmed Shalaby Bardan  3 , Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati  4 , John Sparrow  5 , Christopher Liu  6   7   8
Affiliations

A stakeholder meeting exploring the ethical perspectives of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery

Matthew Quinn et al. J Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Purpose: The purported benefits and risks of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) have been well described, yet the procedure remains controversial among UK ophthalmologists. As many of the controversies of ISBCS are underpinned by ethical dilemmas, the aim of this work was to explore the ethical perspectives of ISBCS from a variety of stakeholder viewpoints.

Method: A semi-structured independent stakeholder meeting was convened at the Royal College of Ophthalmologists London headquarters in June 2018. In total, 29 stakeholders attended the meeting. The professional characteristics of stakeholders included but were not limited to: ophthalmologists (9), patients (5), religious leaders (4), ethicists (2), lawyers (2) and commissioners (1). Thematic qualitative analysis using methodology proposed by Braun and Clarke was conducted on the resultant transcript of the discussion.

Results: Themes identified include: (1) beneficence and non-maleficence (patient benefits, patient risks, the uncertainties of risk, patient interpretation of the risk-benefit analysis); (2) autonomy (informed consent, the barriers to communication); (3) distributive justice (the allocation of resources: the individual vs the collective).

Conclusion: This analysis provides a reference point for the ethical factors surrounding ISBCS. The stakeholders concluded that this approach was an ethical undertaking provided patient autonomy was appropriately attained. This requires a patient's interpretation of the risk-benefit balance, which must include an understanding of the low but unquantifiable risk of severe complications. A surgeon must aim to minimise risks through the adaption of accepted surgical protocols and by performing appropriate patient selection. Currently, cost savings to healthcare that may occur following the implementation of ISBCS should be considered a secondary benefit of the protocol.

Keywords: autonomy; ethics; informed consent; patient perspective; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists . The way forward, 2015. Available: https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/RCOphth-The-Way-For... [Accessed Feb 2020].
    1. Singh R, Dohlman TH, Sun G. Immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery: advantages and disadvantages. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2017;28(1):81–6. 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000327 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grzybowski A, Wasinska-Borowiec W, Claoué C. Pros and cons of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS). Saudi J Ophthalmol 2016;30(4):244–9. 10.1016/j.sjopt.2016.09.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang DF. Simultaneous bilateral cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87(3):253–4. 10.1136/bjo.87.3.253 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee E, Balasingam B, Mills EC, et al. . A survey exploring ophthalmologists’ attitudes and beliefs in performing Immediately Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery in the United Kingdom. BMC Ophthalmol 2020;20(1). 10.1186/s12886-020-01475-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed