Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;39(2):198-206.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0677-y. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells

Affiliations

Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells

Hui Kwon Kim et al. Nat Biotechnol. 2021 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

Prime editing enables the introduction of virtually any small-sized genetic change without requiring donor DNA or double-strand breaks. However, evaluation of prime editing efficiency requires time-consuming experiments, and the factors that affect efficiency have not been extensively investigated. In this study, we performed high-throughput evaluation of prime editor 2 (PE2) activities in human cells using 54,836 pairs of prime editing guide RNAs (pegRNAs) and their target sequences. The resulting data sets allowed us to identify factors affecting PE2 efficiency and to develop three computational models to predict pegRNA efficiency. For a given target sequence, the computational models predict efficiencies of pegRNAs with different lengths of primer binding sites and reverse transcriptase templates for edits of various types and positions. Testing the accuracy of the predictions using test data sets that were not used for training, we found Spearman's correlations between 0.47 and 0.81. Our computational models and information about factors affecting PE2 efficiency will facilitate practical application of prime editing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019). - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Lin, Q. et al. Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 582–585 (2020). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chari, R., Mali, P., Moosburner, M. & Church, G. M. Unraveling CRISPR–Cas9 genome engineering parameters via a library-on-library approach. Nat. Methods 12, 823–826 (2015). - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Doench, J. G. et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR–Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1262–1267 (2014). - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Doench, J. G. et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR–Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 184–191 (2016). - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources