Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 21;35(37):e304.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e304.

Prognosis of Split Liver Transplantation Compared with Whole Liver Transplantation in Adult Patients: Single-center Results under the Korean MELD Score-based Allocation Policy

Affiliations

Prognosis of Split Liver Transplantation Compared with Whole Liver Transplantation in Adult Patients: Single-center Results under the Korean MELD Score-based Allocation Policy

Gil Chun Park et al. J Korean Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Split liver transplantation (SLT) has been occasionally performed in Korea. This study compared the incidence and prognosis of SLT with whole liver transplantation (WLT) in adult patients.

Methods: Between June 2016 and November 2019, 242 adult patients underwent a total of 256 deceased donor liver transplantation operations. SLT was performed in 7 patients (2.9%).

Results: The mean age of SLT donors was 29.7 ± 7.4 years, and the mean age of recipients was 55.7 ± 10.6 years, with the latter having a mean model for end-stage liver disease score of 34.6 ± 3.1. Mean split right liver graft weight was 1,228.6 ± 149.7 g and mean graft-recipient weight ratio was 1.97 ± 0.39. Of the seven SLT recipients, Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) status was one in status 1, one in status 2 and five in status 3. The graft (P = 0.72) and patient (P = 0.84) survival rates were comparable in the SLT and WLT groups. Following propensity score matching, graft (P = 0.61) and patient (P = 0.91) survival rates remained comparable in the two groups. Univariate analysis showed that pretransplant ventilator support and renal replacement therapy were significantly associated with patient survival, whereas KONOS status category and primary liver diseases were not. Multivariate analysis showed that pretransplant ventilator support was an independent risk factor for patient survival.

Conclusion: Survival outcomes were similar in adult SLT and WLT recipients, probably due to selection of high-quality grafts and low-risk recipients. Prudent selection of donors and adult recipients for SLT may expand the liver graft pool for pediatric patients without affecting outcomes in adults undergoing SLT.

Keywords: Deceased Donor; Extended Right Liver Graft; Organ Donor Shortage; Whole Liver Graft.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Comparison of the posttransplant liver CT images taken within 1 week and 3–6 months after split liver transplantation. Case No. 2 and 3 were classified as having a large ischemic area at the retained segment IV portion and other 5 cases were regarded as having a small ischemic area. Contrast-non-enhanced CT scans were taken in 3 cases because of renal dysfunction.
CT = computed tomography.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Comparison of the survival curves. Comparison of the (A) graft and (B) patient survival curves between the SLT group and WLT control group. Comparison of the (C) graft and (D) patient survival curves between the SLT group and PSM-WLT control group.
SLT = split liver transplantation, WLT = whole liver transplantation, PSM = propensity score matching.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Comparison of the survival curves. (A) Comparison of the patient survival curves according to the KONOS status categories, (B) the primary liver diseases for transplantation, (C) pretransplant ventilator support, and (D) pretransplant renal replacement therapy.
KONOS = Korean Network for Organ Sharing, ALD = alcoholic liver disease, SALF = subacute liver failure, HBV-LC = hepatitis B virus-associated liver cirrhosis, HCV-LC = hepatitis C virus-associated liver disease.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pichlmayr R, Ringe B, Gubernatis G, Hauss J, Bunzendahl H. Transplantation of a donor liver to 2 recipients (splitting transplantation)--a new method in the further development of segmental liver transplantation. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1988;373(2):127–130. - PubMed
    1. Broelsch CE, Emond JC, Whitington PF, Thistlethwaite JR, Baker AL, Lichtor JL. Application of reduced-size liver transplants as split grafts, auxiliary orthotopic grafts, and living related segmental transplants. Ann Surg. 1990;212(3):368–375. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Renz JF, Yersiz H, Reichert PR, Hisatake GM, Farmer DG, Emond JC, et al. Split-liver transplantation: a review. Am J Transplant. 2003;3(11):1323–1335. - PubMed
    1. Adam R, McMaster P, O'Grady JG, Castaing D, Klempnauer JL, Jamieson N, et al. Evolution of liver transplantation in Europe: report of the European Liver Transplant Registry. Liver Transpl. 2003;9(12):1231–1243. - PubMed
    1. Superina R. To split or not to split: that is the question. Liver Transpl. 2012;18(4):389–390. - PubMed