Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 18;10(9):1688.
doi: 10.3390/ani10091688.

The Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Two Arctic Fox (Alopex lagopus) Farms in Poland

Affiliations

The Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Two Arctic Fox (Alopex lagopus) Farms in Poland

Jan Siemionek et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine the occurrence of Salmonella spp. infections in two Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) farms in Poland, and to analyse the correlations between animals that tested positive for Salmonella spp and breeding results. Faecal samples were taken from 1094 clinically healthy blue foxes from the basic stock of farms A and B. Salmonella spp. were detected in 18.06% (56/310) of the samples collected in farm A and in 15.94% (125/784) of the samples collected in farm B. All isolated strains belonged to S. enterica subsp. enterica serotypes Salmonella Saintpaul (S. Saintpaul), Salmonella Reading (S. Reading), and Salmonella Heidelberg (S. Heidelberg). All three serotypes are typically isolated from commercial poultry flocks. Salmonella spp. infections significantly increased the risk of female infertility, but further research is needed to confirm the results. This is the first report on the prevalence of S. Heidelberg, S. Saintpaul, and S. Reading in faecal samples collected from Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) farms in Poland.

Keywords: Poland; Salmonella spp.; arctic foxes; epidemiology; one health approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Foley S.L., Johnson T.J., Ricke S.C., Nayak R., Danzeisen J. Salmonella pathogenicity and host adaptation in chicken-associated serovars. Microbial. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013;77:582–607. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00015-13. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. EFSA and ECDC (European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J. 2019;17 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5926. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grimont P.A.D., Weill F.X. Antigenic Formulae of the Salmonella Serovars. 9th ed. WHO Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Salmonella, Institut Pasteur; Paris, France: 2007.
    1. Pires S.M., Vigre H., Makela P., Hald T. Using outbreak data for source attribution of human salmonellosis and campylobacteriosis in Europe. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2010;7:1351–1361. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0564. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rubini S., Ravaioli C., Previato S., D’Incau M., Tassinari M., Guidi E., Lupi S., Merialdi G., Bergamini M. Prevalence of Salmonella strains in wild animals from a highly populated area of north-eastern Italy. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita. 2016;52:277–280. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources