Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 20;17(18):6863.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186863.

A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rotator Cuff Tears

Vincenzo Candela  1 , Umile Giuseppe Longo  1 , Calogero Di Naro  1 , Gabriella Facchinetti  2 , Anna Marchetti  2 , Gaia Sciotti  2 , Giulia Santamaria  2 , Ilaria Piergentili  1 , Maria Grazia De Marinis  2 , Ara Nazarian  3 , Vincenzo Denaro  1
Affiliations
Review

A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rotator Cuff Tears

Vincenzo Candela et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Our research aimed to evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) linked to rotator cuff (RC) tears. The present study analyzed factors connected to the quality of the RCTs and trends in the quality of reporting through time. Materials and Methods: The online databases used to search all RCTs on the topic of RC surgery completed until March 2020 were PubMed and Ovid (MEDLINE). The quality of reporting was evaluated using the modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS) and the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT). Results: The online search found 957 articles. Finally, 183 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. A total of 97 (53%) of 183 studies had a level of evidence I and 86 (47%) of 183 studies had a level of evidence II, according to the Oxford Center of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM). A statistically significant difference in MCMS between articles written before 2010 and articles written after 2010 was found. Articles written after 2010 had, on average, the highest Coleman score. The average number of CONSORT checklist items for each article across all analyzed RCTs was 21.67. The 37 studies completed up to 2010 averaged a number of checklist items of 19.97 and the studies completed between 2011 and 2019 averaged a number of checklist items of 22.10. A statistically significant difference in the number of checklist items between articles written before 2010 and articles written after 2010 was found. Articles written after 2010 had on average more checklist items. However, low correlation (0.26) between the number of checklist items for each article and the respective Coleman score was found. On the other hand, articles with the CONSORT diagram had a significantly high Coleman score. Conclusions: An improvement in the quantity and quality of RCTs relating to RC surgery over the analyzed period was found.

Keywords: consolidated standards of reporting trials; modified Coleman methodology score; quality; randomized controlled trial; rotator cuff tear.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2009 Flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Coleman score analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrams G.D., Gupta A.K., Hussey K.E., Tetteh E.S., Karas V., Bach B.R., Cole B.J., Romeo A.A., Verma N.N. Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears With and Without Acromioplasty: Randomized Prospective Trial With 2-Year Follow-up. Am. J. Sports Med. 2014;42:1296–1303. doi: 10.1177/0363546514529091. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dezaly C., Sirveaux F., Philippe R., Wein-Remy F., Sedaghatian J., Roche O., Molé D. Arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tear in the over-60s: Repair is preferable to isolated acromioplasty-tenotomy in the short term. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2011;97:S125–S130. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.06.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jacquot A., Dezaly C., Goetzmann T., Roche O., Sirveaux F., Molé D., French Society for Shoulder E.b.S. Is rotator cuff repair appropriate in patients older than 60 years of age? prospective, randomised trial in 103 patients with a mean four-year follow-up. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2014;100:S333–S338. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.04.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. MacDonald P., McRae S., Leiter J., Mascarenhas R., Lapner P. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial. J. Bone Join. Surg. Am. Vol. 2011;93:1953–1960. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00488. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mohtadi N.G., Hollinshead R.M., Sasyniuk T.M., Fletcher J.A., Chan D.S., Li F.X. A randomized clinical trial comparing open to arthroscopic acromioplasty with mini-open rotator cuff repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: Disease-specific quality of life outcome at an average 2-year follow-up. Am. J. Sports Med. 2008;36:1043–1051. doi: 10.1177/0363546508314409. - DOI - PubMed