Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;47(6):925-932.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Sep 19.

Resilience Among Professional Health Workers in Emergency Services

Resilience Among Professional Health Workers in Emergency Services

Marta Sánchez-Zaballos et al. J Emerg Nurs. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Although it seems logical that working in an emergency service implies having a great capacity to face extreme situations, resilience in health care workers has been shown to be related not only to individual personality characteristics but also with external factors. The objective of this study was to understand the resilience of health professionals working in hospital and in-hospital emergency services and to determine the relationships of resilience with sociodemographic and work-related conditions.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included emergency physicians, nurses, and nursing assistants. Sociodemographic variables, work characteristics, and the Resilience Scale-25 were analyzed. Data were not missing at random and models with imputed data were tested.

Results: A total of 321 professionals participated. Their mean age was 43.36 years (SD 8.73), and 81.31% were women. The mean resilience score was 133.38 (SD 17.11), which corresponds to moderately low to moderate levels. Being single (B = -7.35; P < .01) or divorced (B = -8.26; P = .04) were associated with decreased resilience in the raw score of the Resilience Scale-25. Working shifts that do not include night shift (OR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.04, 3.90, P = .04) and being a nurse (OR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.07, 4.18; P = .03) were associated with higher odds of belonging to categories of lower resilience levels. However, more professional work experience was related to lower odds of belonging to categories of lower resilience levels (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.99, P < .04). Several variables, including marital status, demonstrated inconsistent associations across different modeling methods.

Conclusions: Resilience in professional health workers was related to personal and working conditions. The scores of emergency staff were low and improvement with specific strategies is needed.

Keywords: Emergencies; Medical staff; Nursing staff; Psychological resilience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract

References

    1. Fletcher D., Sarkar M. Psychological resilience: a review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. Eur Psychol. 2013;18(1):12–23. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000124. - DOI
    1. McCann C.M., Beddoe E., McCormick K. Resilience in the health professions: a review of recent literature. Int J Wellbeing. 2013;3(1):60–81. doi: 10.5502/ijw.v3i1.4. - DOI
    1. Wagnild G.M., Young H.M. Development and psychometric evaluation of the resilience scale. J Nurs Meas. 1993;1(2):165–178. - PubMed
    1. Martin A.J., Marsh H.W. Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: a construct validity approach. J Sch Psychol. 2006;43(3):267–281. doi: 10.1002/pits.20149. - DOI
    1. Cao X., Chen L. Relationships among social support, empathy, resilience and work engagement in haemodialysis nurses. Int Nurs Rev. 2019;66(3):366–373. doi: 10.1111/inr.12516. - DOI - PubMed