Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 14;6(3):00193-2020.
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00193-2020. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Core outcome set for the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the COS-AECOPD ERS Task Force study protocol

Affiliations

Core outcome set for the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the COS-AECOPD ERS Task Force study protocol

Alexander G Mathioudakis et al. ERJ Open Res. .

Abstract

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the management of COPD exacerbations evaluate heterogeneous outcomes, often omitting those that are clinically important and patient relevant. This limits their usability and comparability. A core outcome set (COS) is a consensus-based minimum set of clinically important outcomes that should be evaluated in all RCTs in specific areas of health care. We present the study protocol of the COS-AECOPD ERS Task Force, aiming to develop a COS for COPD exacerbation management, that could remedy these limitations. For the development of this COS we follow standard methodology recommended by the COMET initiative. A comprehensive list of outcomes is assembled through a methodological systematic review of the outcomes reported in relevant RCTs. Qualitative research with patients with COPD will also be conducted, aiming to identify additional outcomes that may be important to patients, but are not currently addressed in clinical research studies. Prioritisation of the core outcomes will be facilitated through an extensive, multi-stakeholder Delphi survey with a global reach. Selection will be finalised in an international, multi-stakeholder meeting. For every core outcome, we will recommend a specific measurement instrument and standardised time points for evaluation. Selection of instruments will be based on evidence-informed consensus. Our work will improve the quality, usability and comparability of future RCTs on the management of COPD exacerbations and, ultimately, the care of patients with COPD. Multi-stakeholder engagement and societal support by the European Respiratory Society will raise awareness and promote implementation of the COS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: A.G. Mathioudakis reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: F. Abroug has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Agusti reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Menarini, personal fees from Chiesi, grants and personal fees from GSK, and personal fees from Nuvaira, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Bakke reports personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Chiesi, AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: K. Bartziokas has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Beghe has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Bikov has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Bradbury reports being the recipient of an ongoing 3-year top-up scholarship funded by GlaxoSmithKline. Conflict of interest: G. Brusselle reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi and Teva, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Cadus reports support from AstraZeneca and Mundipharma, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Coleman is an employee of the European Lung Foundation. Conflict of interest: M. Contoli reports grants from Chiesi, personal fees from Chiesi, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, ALK-Abello, Novartis and Zambon, and grants from University of Ferrara, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. Corlateanu has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: O. Corlateanu has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Criner has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Csoma has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Emelyanov has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Faner reports grants from GSK and Menarini outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: G. Fernandez Romero has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: Z. Hammouda has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Horváth has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Huerta Garcia has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Jacobs has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Jenkins has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Joos reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bayer, grants from Chiesi, personal fees from Eureca vzw, grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline and personal fees from Teva, outside the submitted work; these grants and fees were paid to his institution. Conflict of interest: O. Kharevich has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. Kostikas reports grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, ELPEN, GSK, Menarini and Novartis, grants from NuvoAir, and personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work; and was an employee and shareholder of Novartis Pharma AG until 31 October 2018. Conflict of interest: E. Lapteva has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: Z. Lazar has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.D. Leuppi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Liddle has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. López-Giraldo has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V.M. McDonald reports grants and personal fees from GSK and AstraZeneca, and personal fees from Menarini, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R. Nielsen reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from Novartis, and grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. Papi reports grants, personal fees, nonfinancial support and other from GlaxoSmithKline; grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca; grants, personal fees, nonfinancial support and other from Boehringer Ingelheim; grants, personal fees, nonfinancial support and other from Chiesi Farmaceutici; grants, personal fees, nonfinancial support and other from TEVA; personal fees, non-financial support and other from Mundipharma; personal fees, non-financial support and other from Zambon; personal fees, non-financial support and other from Novartis; grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Menarini; personal fees, non-financial support and other from Sanofi/Regeneron; personal fees from Roche; grants from Fondazione Maugeri; grants from Fondazione Chiesi; and personal fees from Edmondpharma, all outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: I. Saraiva has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Sergeeva has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Sioutkou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Sivapalan reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: E. Stovold has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Wang has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Wen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Yorke has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.R. Williamson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Vestbo reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Chiesi, personal fees from GSK, and personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work; and his son is an employee of Chiesi. Conflict of interest: J-U. Jensen has nothing to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Delphi round 2. Respondents will be provided with the score distributions from the first Delphi round, stratified by stakeholder category. Their previous scoring will also be highlighted. (In this example, the respondent's score for this outcome was 8.) Respondents will be asked to reconsider their scoring, based on the available data. They will be under no pressure to change their scores.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. GBD 2015 Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Respir Med 2017; 5: 691–706. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30293-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. GBD Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390: 1151–1210. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martinez FJ, et al. . Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 report: GOLD executive summary. Eur Respir J 2017; 49: 1700214. doi:10.1183/13993003.00214-2017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wedzicha JA, Seemungal TA. COPD exacerbations: defining their cause and prevention. Lancet 2007; 370: 786–796. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61382-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mathioudakis AG, Janssens W, Sivapalan P, et al. . Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: in search of diagnostic biomarkers and treatable traits. Thorax 2020; 75: 520–527. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214484 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources