Transfusion reactions in pediatric and adolescent young adult haematology oncology and immune effector cell patients

Abstract

Background: Active surveillance for transfusion reactions is critically important among pediatric patients undergoing chemotherapy. Among pediatric-adolescent-young-adult (AYA) hematology/oncology patients, who have been typically excluded from transfusion reaction studies, this profile remains poorly characterized.

Methods: We assessed the incidence and clinical characteristics of transfusion reactions (n = 3246 transfusions) in this population (n = 201 patients) at our center.

Findings: The incidence of adjudicated transfusion reactions was 2·04%. The incidence was higher for platelet (2·78%) compared to packed red blood cell transfusions (1·49%) (p = 0·0149). The majority (61·4%) of all reactions were classified as febrile non-haemolytic transfusion, while 35·7% were considered allergic, and 2·9% were classified as transfusion-associated circulatory overload. The incidence of transfusion reactions in patients who were pre-medicated was higher (2·51%) than in patients who were not (1·52%) (p = 0·0406). Sub-set analysis revealed a 3·95% incidence of adjudicated transfusion reactions among recipients of immune effector cells (IECs) (n = 3), all of which occurred during the potential window for cytokine release syndrome; two-thirds of these reactions were severe/potentially life-threatening.

Interpretation: The incidence of transfusion reactions among pediatric-AYA hematology/oncology patients may be lower than the general pediatric population. Patients with a prior history of transfusion reactions and those receiving platelet transfusions may be at higher risk for reaction. From our limited sample, IEC recipients may be at risk for severe transfusion reactions. Large multi-center prospective studies are needed to characterize transfusion reactions in this population. Appropriate characterization of reactions in this population may inform risk stratification and mitigate missed opportunities for prompt recognition and appropriate management.

Funding: None.

Fig. 1

(A) Average number of transfusions per patient in each demographic category. (B) Average number of transfusions per patient with each underlying diagnosis or transplant status. (C) Transfusion reaction rate of each type of reaction within the diagnostic categories listed.

Fig. 2

(A) Transfusion reaction rate by demographic characteristics. (B) Transfusion reaction rate by underlying diagnosis. (C) Transfusion reaction rate by blood product.