Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 23;8(9):e20203.
doi: 10.2196/20203.

Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of a Clinical Photo Documentation App and its Implications for Clinical Workflows and Quality of Care: Qualitative Case Study

Christine Jacob  1   2 , Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez  3 , Chris Ivory  3
Affiliations

Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of a Clinical Photo Documentation App and its Implications for Clinical Workflows and Quality of Care: Qualitative Case Study

Christine Jacob et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) tools have shown promise in clinical photo and wound documentation for their potential to improve workflows, expand access to care, and improve the quality of patient care. However, some barriers to adoption persist.

Objective: This study aims to understand the social, organizational, and technical factors affecting clinicians' adoption of a clinical photo documentation mHealth app and its implications for clinical workflows and quality of care.

Methods: A qualitative case study of a clinical photo and wound documentation app called imitoCam was conducted. The data were collected through 20 in-depth interviews with mHealth providers, clinicians, and medical informatics experts from 8 clinics and hospitals in Switzerland and Germany.

Results: According to the study participants, the use of mHealth in clinical photo and wound documentation provides numerous benefits such as time-saving and efficacy, better patient safety and quality of care, enhanced data security and validation, and better accessibility. The clinical workflow may also improve when the app is a good fit, resulting in better collaboration and transparency, streamlined daily work, clinician empowerment, and improved quality of care. The findings included important factors that may contribute to or hinder adoption. Factors may be related to the material nature of the tool, such as the perceived usefulness, ease of use, interoperability, cost, or security of the app, or social aspects such as personal experience, attitudes, awareness, or culture. Organizational and policy barriers include the available clinical practice infrastructure, workload and resources, the complexity of decision making, training, and ambiguity or lack of regulations. User engagement in the development and implementation process is a vital contributor to the successful adoption of mHealth apps.

Conclusions: The promising potential of mHealth in clinical photo and wound documentation is clear and may enhance clinical workflow and quality of care; however, the factors affecting adoption go beyond the technical features of the tool itself to embrace significant social and organizational elements. Technology providers, clinicians, and decision makers should work together to carefully address any barriers to improve adoption and harness the potential of these tools.

Keywords: dermatology; digital health; eHealth; health tech; mHealth; mobile health; mobile phone; telehealth; user-engagement; wound care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Utility and limitations of the app.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Technical and social factors impacting user adoption.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Organizational and policy factors impacting user adoption.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Puszka S, Dingwall KM, Sweet M, Nagel T. E-mental health innovations for Aboriginal and Torres strait islander Australians: a qualitative study of implementation needs in health services. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Sep 19;3(3):e43. doi: 10.2196/mental.5837. https://mental.jmir.org/2016/3/e43/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Clinicians' role in the adoption of an oncology decision support app in Europe and its implications for organizational practices: qualitative case study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 3;7(5):e13555. doi: 10.2196/13555. https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/5/e13555/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kotronoulas G, Papadopoulou C, MacNicol L, Simpson M, Maguire R. Feasibility and acceptability of the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the delivery of nurse-led supportive care to people with colorectal cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Aug;29:115–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morilla MD, Sans M, Casasa A, Giménez N. Implementing technology in healthcare: insights from physicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jun 27;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0489-2. https://bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12911-0... - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kotronoulas G, Connaghan J, Grenfell J, Gupta G, Smith L, Simpson M, Maguire R. Employing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to support newly diagnosed patients with melanoma: Feasibility and acceptability of a holistic needs assessment intervention. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Dec;31:59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.10.002. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources