Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 3;17(4):990-999.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1808411. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake: a longitudinal study showing ethnic differences in the influence of the intention-to-vaccinate among parent-daughter dyads

Affiliations

Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake: a longitudinal study showing ethnic differences in the influence of the intention-to-vaccinate among parent-daughter dyads

Vita W Jongen et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. .

Abstract

Introduction: It is unclear what role daughters play in the decision-making process regarding HPV vaccination. Therefore, we explored the impact of HPV vaccination intention among parents and their 12-13 year-old daughters on HPV vaccination uptake.

Methods: In February 2014 parents/guardians and their 12-13 year-old daughters were invited to complete a questionnaire about socio-psychological determinants of the decision-making process regarding HPV vaccination. Vaccination status of the daughter was retrieved from the national vaccination database after the last possible vaccination date in 2014. The association between HPV vaccination uptake and intention, and determinants of intention, was jointly assessed using a generalized structural equation model, stratified by origin of parents (Dutch versus non-Dutch).

Results: In total, 273 Dutch parent-daughter dyads and 165 non-Dutch dyads were analyzed for this study. HPV vaccination uptake was 90% (246/273) and 84% (139/165) in the Dutch and non-Dutch group, respectively. In the Dutch group, high parental intention (β = 2.3, 95%CI 1.2-3.3) and high daughters' intention (β = 1.5, 95%CI 0.41-2.6) were significantly associated with HPV vaccination uptake. In the non-Dutch group, high daughters' intention (β = 1.2, 95%CI 0.16-2.2) was significantly associated with HPV vaccination, but high parental intention was not (β = 0.52, 95%CI -0.47-1.5). Attitude was the most prominent socio-psychological determinant associated with vaccination intention among all groups.

Conclusion: In the non-Dutch group, only daughters' intention was significantly associated with HPV vaccination uptake, whereas in the Dutch group both the parents' and the daughters' intention were significantly associated with uptake. The role of the child in the decision-making process might need to be taken into account when developing new interventions focused on increasing HPV vaccination uptake, especially among individuals of non-Dutch origin.

Keywords: HPV; Human papillomavirus; The Netherlands; parent-daughter dyads; vaccination; vaccination acceptability; vaccination intention; vaccination uptake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Heat map of the marginal prediction of HPV vaccination uptake corresponding to each combination of HPV vaccination intention among parents and their daughters. (a). Dutch parent-daughter dyads. (b). Non-Dutch parent-daughter dyads. Circle size is proportional to the number of parent-daughter dyads for a given combination of intentions; non-observed combinations were omitted from the graph. The color of the circle indicates that ≥80% (green), 60–79% (yellow), 40–59% (orange), 20–39% (pink) or <20% (red) of daughters for a given combination were vaccinated against HPV
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Generalized structural equation model including determinants of the intention of parents and daughters associated with HPV vaccination uptake. 2a. Dutch parent-daughter dyads. 2b. Non-Dutch parent-daughter dyads. The numbers next to each pathway indicate the regression coefficient (β) and the 95% confidence interval. ε indicates the random error component within the individual regression models. In the Dutch GSEM: the pathway between attitude and past experiences with cervical cancer was removed from the model as it was not significant

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Martel C, Plummer M, Vignat J, Franceschi S.. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. Int J Cancer. 2017;141:664–70. doi:10.1002/ijc.30716. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruni L, Diaz M, Barrionuevo-Rosas L, Herrero R, Bray F, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S, Castellsagué X. Global estimates of human papillomavirus vaccination coverage by region and income level: a pooled analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2016;4(7):e453–e63. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30099-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Newman PA, Logie CH, Lacombe-Duncan A, Baiden P, Tepjan S, Rubincam C, Doukas N, Asey F. Parents’ uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines for their children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e019206. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019206. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Lier A, McDonald SA, Bouwknegt M, Kretzschmar ME, Havelaar AH, Mangen MJJ, Wallinga J, de Melker HE. Disease burden of 32 infectious diseases in the Netherlands, 2007-2011. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0153106. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDonald SA, Qendri V, Berkhof J, de Melker HE, Bogaards JA. Disease burden of human papillomavirus infection in the Netherlands, 1989-2014: the gap between females and males is diminishing. Cancer Causes Control. 2017;28:203–14. doi:10.1007/s10552-017-0870-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances