Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 23;9(1):157.
doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00817-3.

Impact of national policy on hand hygiene promotion activities in hospitals in Korea

Affiliations

Impact of national policy on hand hygiene promotion activities in hospitals in Korea

Pyoeng Gyun Choe et al. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. .

Abstract

Background: After the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreak in Korea in 2015, the Government established a strategy for infection prevention to encourage infection control activities in hospitals. The new policy was announced in December 2015 and implemented in September 2016. The aim of this study is to evaluate how infection control activities improved within Korean hospitals after the change in government policy.

Methods: Three cross-sectional surveys using the WHO Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework (HHSAF) were conducted in 2013, 2015, and 2017. Using a multivariable linear regression model, we analyzed the change in total HHSAF score according to survey year.

Results: A total of 32 hospitals participated in the survey in 2013, 52 in 2015, and 101 in 2017. The number of inpatient beds per infection control professionals decreased from 324 in 2013 to 303 in 2015 and 179 in 2017. Most hospitals were at intermediate or advanced levels of progress (90.6% in 2013, 86.6% in 2015, and 94.1% in 2017). In the multivariable linear regression model, total HHSAF score was significantly associated with hospital teaching status (β coefficient of major teaching hospital, 52.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9 to 96.4; P = 0.018), beds size (β coefficient of 100 beds increase, 5.1; 95% CI, 0.3 to 9.8; P = 0.038), and survey time (β coefficient of 2017 survey, 45.1; 95% CI, 19.3 to 70.9; P = 0.001).

Conclusions: After the new national policy was implemented, the number of infection control professionals increased, and hand hygiene promotion activities were strengthened across Korean hospitals.

Keywords: Hand hygiene; Infection control practitioners; Policy; Reimbursement; WHO.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
WHO Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework scores by category

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in healthcare in health care https://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/tools/9789241597906/en/ Accessed 15 April 2020.
    1. Pittet D, Allegranzi B, Sax H, Dharan S, Pessoa-Silva CL, Donaldson L, Boyce JM. Who global patient safety challenge WAfPS: evidence-based model for hand transmission during patient care and the role of improved practices. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6(10):641–652. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70600-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. A guide to the implementation of the WHO multimodal hand hygiene improvement strategy http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70030 Accessed 15 April 2020.
    1. Stewardson AJ, Allegranzi B, Perneger TV, Attar H, Pittet D. Testing the WHO hand hygiene self-assessment framework for usability and reliability. J Hosp Infect. 2013;83(1):30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.05.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework. https://www.who.int/gpsc/country_work/hhsa_framework_October_2010.pdf Accessed 15 April 2020.

Publication types